Iranian cancer patients’ perception of spirituality: a qualitative content analysis study
© Rahnama et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 6 September 2011
Accepted: 25 September 2012
Published: 9 October 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|6 Sep 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lois Ramondetta|
|24 Jan 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John Paley|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John Paley|
|9 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Mojgan Rahnama|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|9 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|9 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Mojgan Rahnama|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|9 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|13 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Mojgan Rahnama|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|13 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|25 Sep 2012||Editorially accepted|
|9 Oct 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6955-11-19|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.