Australian nurses in general practice, enabling the provision of cervical screening and well women’s health care services: a qualitative study
- Jane Mills†1Email author,
- Jennifer Chamberlain-Salaun†1,
- Leane Christie2,
- Margot Kingston3,
- Elise Gorman4 and
- Caroline Harvey5
© Mills et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 23 July 2012
Accepted: 8 November 2012
Published: 12 November 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|23 Jul 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|16 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - A Raymont|
|18 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christopher Pearce|
|4 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Jane Mills|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|4 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christopher Pearce|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Nov 2012||Editorially accepted|
|12 Nov 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6955-11-23|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.