Marking out the clinical expert/clinical leader/clinical scholar: perspectives from nurses in the clinical arena
© Mannix et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 27 November 2012
Accepted: 5 April 2013
Published: 15 April 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|27 Nov 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Lesley Wilkes|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Stanley|
|29 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kaisa Haatainen|
|31 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martin McNamara|
|6 Mar 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Lesley Wilkes|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|6 Mar 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|20 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Stanley|
|2 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martin McNamara|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|5 Apr 2013||Editorially accepted|
|15 Apr 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6955-12-12|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.