Implementation of case studies in undergraduate didactic nursing courses: a qualitative study
© Dutra; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 28 September 2012
Accepted: 3 July 2013
Published: 4 July 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|28 Sep 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Danette Dutra|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|3 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kim Jocelyn Usher|
|7 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Laurie Grealish|
|26 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Danette Dutra|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|16 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kim Jocelyn Usher|
|20 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Leana Uys|
|24 Jun 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Danette Dutra|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|24 Jun 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|3 Jul 2013||Editorially accepted|
|4 Jul 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6955-12-15|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.