An investigation into the spiritual needs of neuro-oncology patients from a nurse perspective
© Nixon et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 20 April 2012
Accepted: 28 January 2013
Published: 1 February 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|20 Apr 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Aru Narayanasamy|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dong Wook Shin|
|25 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shuh-Jen Sheu|
|29 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alan Astrow|
|28 Sep 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Aru Narayanasamy|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|28 Sep 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|15 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dong Wook Shin|
|24 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shuh-Jen Sheu|
|6 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Aru Narayanasamy|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|6 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|17 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shuh-Jen Sheu|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|28 Jan 2013||Editorially accepted|
|1 Feb 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6955-12-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.