Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Leg ulcer nursing care in the community: a prospective cohort study of the symptom of pain

  • Elizabeth G VanDenKerkhof1, 2Email author,
  • Wilma M Hopman3, 4,
  • Meg E Carley1,
  • Janet L Kuhnke5 and
  • Margaret B Harrison1, 4
BMC Nursing201312:3

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6955-12-3

Received: 6 September 2012

Accepted: 31 January 2013

Published: 6 February 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
6 Sep 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Elizabeth VanDenKerkhof
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
14 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kathleen Finlayson
16 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Helen Edwards
21 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Elizabeth VanDenKerkhof
Resubmission - Version 5
21 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
31 Jan 2013 Editorially accepted
6 Feb 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6955-12-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

School of Nursing, Queen’s University
Department of Anesthesiology, Queen’s University
Clinical Research Centre, Kingston General Hospital
Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Queen’s University
St. Lawrence College/Laurentian University