Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of key studies which report on timing of commencement of enteral feeding during treatment

From: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial of early prophylactic feeding via gastrostomy versus standard care in high risk patients with head and neck cancer

Citation

Study population

N

Type and timing of tube placement

Commencement of feeds (no. days after start of treatment)

Outcomes

Nugent et al., Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics 2010, 23(3):277-284

HNC treated with radical chemoradiotherapy requiring tube feeding

50

Prophylactic PEG (before start of treatment) n = 21

Range: 1–33 days

Mean weight loss: −4.6%

Late PEG (during treatment) n = 11

Range: 14–30 days

Mean weight loss: −8.7%

NG tube n = 18

Range: 10–34 days

Mean weight loss: −8.5%

Raykher et al., JPEN 2009, 33(4):404-410

HNC with definitive or adjuvant chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy requiring PEG

163

Prophylactic PEG (before start of treatment) n = 161

Mean 21 days

PEG used by n = 160 (98%) due to severe dysphagia (mean duration of use 251 +/− 317 days)

Late PEG (during treatment) n = 2

Treatment interruptions in 7%

Strictures requiring dilatation in 12%

BMI optimised in obese/overweight patients through individual regimens

Scolapio et al., Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology 2001, 33(3):215-217

HNC with definitive or adjuvant radiotherapy requiring PEG

54

Prophylactic PEG (before start of treatment) n = 41

Mean 10 days

Mean wt loss 2.7 kg

Nil nutrition related admissions

Late PEG (during treatment) n = 13

Mean 23 days

Mean wt loss 4.5 kg

Nutrition related admissions n = 4

  1. KEY: HNC = Head and Neck Cancer; PEG = percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy; NG = nasogastric tube; BMI = body mass index.