The factors facilitating and inhibiting effective clinical decision-making in nursing: a qualitative study
© Hagbaghery et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004
Received: 14 December 2003
Accepted: 06 April 2004
Published: 06 April 2004
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|14 Dec 2003||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Jan 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mary K Anthony|
|12 Feb 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Florence Myrick|
|29 Feb 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Mohsen Adib-Hajbaghery|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Feb 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Mar 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mary K Anthony|
|24 Mar 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Florence Myrick|
|5 Apr 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Mohsen Adib-Hajbaghery|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|5 Apr 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|6 Apr 2004||Editorially accepted|
|6 Apr 2004||Article published||10.1186/1472-6955-3-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.