Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Experiencing neutropenia: Quality of life interviews with adult cancer patients

  • Barry V Fortner1, 2Email author,
  • Kurt W Tauer1,
  • Ted Okon2,
  • Arthur C Houts1, 2 and
  • Lee S Schwartzberg1
BMC Nursing20054:4

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6955-4-4

Received: 04 February 2005

Accepted: 08 July 2005

Published: 08 July 2005

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
4 Feb 2005 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Mar 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael Trimmel
17 Apr 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paolo Pedrazzoli
23 May 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christine Miaskowski
22 Jun 2005 Author responded Author comments - Barry V Fortner
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Jun 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Jul 2005 Editorially accepted
8 Jul 2005 Article published 10.1186/1472-6955-4-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

West Clinic, 100 Humphreys Blvd Suite 100
Supportive Oncology Services and Accelerated Community Oncology Research Network, 1790 Kirby Parkway