Table 3 Framework validation - Feedback from participants (n = 15)
Evaluation item | Strongly disagree | Disagree | Agree | Strongly agree | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The framework is important | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 15 (100%) | Â |
The development of the framework is logical | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (13.3%) | 13 (86.7%) | Â |
Clear definition of concepts and framework easy to understand | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 15 (100%) | Â |
Completeness | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 15 (100%) | Â |
The framework is structured in logical manner | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (26.6%) | 11 (73.4%) | to refine the structure and the visual presentation of the framework for more clarity |
The framework is applicable for its purpose | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 15 (100%) | very feasible whenever it is presented to policy makers |
Validity | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (13.3%) | 13 (86.7%) | Â |
Practicality | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 15 (100%) | very practical as it is dynamic: integration of teaching in clinical and collaboration of stakeholders |