Skip to main content

Table 2 The Effects and 95% Confidence Intervals

From: How does strength use relate to burnout among Chinese healthcare professionals? Exploring the mediating roles of beliefs about stress and basic psychological needs satisfaction

Model pathways

Estimated

95% CI

Lower

Upper

Direct effect

   

Strength use→burnout

-0.051

-0.124

0.022

Indirect effect

   

Strength use→burnout

-0.365a

-0.430

-0.299

Strength use→ BASS-P→ burnout

-0.027

-0.076

0.018

Strength use→ BASS-N→ burnout

-0.054a

-0.079

-0.030

Strength use→ BASS-C→ burnout

-0.063a

-0.115

-0.012

Strength use→ BPNS→ burnout

-0.220a

-0.274

-0.168

IndEff [BASS-N] minus IndEff [BASS-C]

0.009

-0.045

0.065

IndEff [BASS-N] minus IndEff [BPNS]

0.166a

0.106

0.225

IndEff [BASS-C] minus IndEff [BPNS]

0.156a

0.074

0.240

  1. a Empirical 95% confidence interval does not overlap with zero. IndEff = Indirect effect. BASS = Beliefs About Stress Scale, BASS-P = Positive stress beliefs, BASS-N = Negative stress beliefs, BASS-C = Control beliefs, BPNS = Basic psychological needs satisfaction