Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A counterbalanced cross-over study of the effects of visual, auditory and no feedback on performance measures in a simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Oct 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Susan Baxley
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dave Hostler
22 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jo Kramer-Johansen
9 Jun 2011 Author responded Author comments - Susan Baxley
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Jun 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
21 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jo Kramer-Johansen
24 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dave Hostler
20 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Susan Baxley
Resubmission - Version 4
20 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
26 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Susan Baxley
Resubmission - Version 5
26 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
1 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Susan Baxley
Resubmission - Version 7
1 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
2 Aug 2011 Editorially accepted
2 Aug 2011 Article published 10.1186/1472-6955-10-15

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement