A Survey of the quality of nursing care in several health districts in South Africa.
© Uys and Naidoo; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004
Received: 27 August 2003
Accepted: 03 February 2004
Published: 03 February 2004
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|27 Aug 2003||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|29 Sep 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - June Larrabee|
|29 Sep 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christine Urquhart|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Jan 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Joanne Rachel Naidoo|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|7 Jan 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Jan 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - June Larrabee|
|28 Jan 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christine Urquhart|
|2 Feb 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Joanne Rachel Naidoo|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|2 Feb 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|3 Feb 2004||Editorially accepted|
|3 Feb 2004||Article published||10.1186/1472-6955-3-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.