This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Patient advocacy: barriers and facilitators
© Negarandeh et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 23 May 2005
Accepted: 01 March 2006
Published: 01 March 2006
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|23 May 2005||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 Sep 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Arja Isola|
|28 Oct 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eli Haugen Bunch|
|22 Nov 2005||Author responded||Author comments - reza negarandeh|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 Nov 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|2 Dec 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Arja Isola|
|5 Dec 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eli Haugen Bunch|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Jan 2006||Author responded||Author comments - reza negarandeh|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|8 Jan 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|14 Feb 2006||Author responded||Author comments - reza negarandeh|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|14 Feb 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|1 Mar 2006||Editorially accepted|
|1 Mar 2006||Article published||10.1186/1472-6955-5-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.