Skip to main content

Table 4 Summary of pre and post-implementation differences in referral outcomes by BPG

From: Implementing nursing best practice guidelines: Impact on patient referrals

BPG

 

Asthma x ¯ MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaacuWG4baEgaqeaaaa@2E3D@ (SD)

Breast-feeding x ¯ MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaacuWG4baEgaqeaaaa@2E3D@ (SD)

DDD x ¯ MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaacuWG4baEgaqeaaaa@2E3D@ (SD)

Smoking Cessation x ¯ MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaacuWG4baEgaqeaaaa@2E3D@ (SD)

Venous Leg Ulcer x ¯ MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaacuWG4baEgaqeaaaa@2E3D@ (SD)

Diabetes Foot Care x ¯ MathType@MTEF@5@5@+=feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfKttLearuWrP9MDH5MBPbIqV92AaeXatLxBI9gBaebbnrfifHhDYfgasaacH8akY=wiFfYdH8Gipec8Eeeu0xXdbba9frFj0=OqFfea0dXdd9vqai=hGuQ8kuc9pgc9s8qqaq=dirpe0xb9q8qiLsFr0=vr0=vr0dc8meaabaqaciaacaGaaeqabaqabeGadaaakeaacuWG4baEgaqeaaaa@2E3D@ (SD)

Nurses' Questionnaire

       

# of items – familiarity with referral source

 

5

5

3

5

2 + 7 1

7

Nurses' familiarity with referral source (range 0–5)

Pre

2.03 (0.7)

2.51 (1.0)

3.33 (0.9)

2.13 (0.9)

4.14 (.81)

2.98 (.89)

2.59 (.78)

 

Post

2.54 (0.9)**

2.74 (1.04)*

3.61 (1.1)*

2.9 (0.9)**

4.08 (.89)

3.78 (.85)**

3.13 (1.01)**

# of items – patient referrals made

 

4

3

3

3

9

3+4 1

Patient referrals in past month by nurses (range 0–1)

Pre

0.23 (0.3)

0.20 (0.23)

0.29 (0.3)

0.22 (0.2)

0.28 (.26)

0.25 (.27)

0.17 (.20)

 

Post

0.85 (.03)**

0.23 (0.24)

0.41 (0.4)*

0.25 (0.29)

0.36 (.26)

0.36 (.34)

0.32 (.30)**

Chart Audit

       

# of referral sources

 

-

-

3

7

17

-

Referrals documented (range 0–1)

Pre

-

-

0.11 (.18)

0 (0)

0.15 (.08)

 
 

Post

  

0.13 (.22)

0.04 (.13)

0.17 (.07)

 

Patient Interviews

       

# of items – information about referral sources

 

6

11

-

7

-

8

Patient reports of having been given information in hospital about referral sources (range 0–1)

Pre

0.20 (.33)

0.44 (.18)

-

0.31 (.27)

-

0.12 (.13)

 

Post

0.38 (.35)

0.47 (.18)

 

0.18 (.18)

 

0.13 (.18)

# of items – contact with referral sources

 

7

12

   

8

Patient reports of telephoning, visiting or receiving assistance from referral sources (range 0–1)

Pre

.23 (.13)

.12 (.07)

-

-

-

0.08 (.11)

 

Post

.25 (.15)

.13 (.08)

   

0.09 (.10)

  1. Notes: * p < .05
  2. ** p <.001
  3. 1 Two-factor solutions were found. Pre- and post-implementation scores are provided for each of the factors.