Critical elements | Indicators of success | Indicators of challenge |
---|---|---|
INPUTS | ||
Participation in proposal development | ● Dean, Nurse Executive, and both program directors participated in proposal writing | ● One or more key leadership positions were vacant at time of proposal preparation |
● Some future faculty candidates produced specific content regarding proposed innovations | ● No input from clinical faculty or nursing staff included in proposal content | |
Collegiality between future partnership members | ● Longstanding pre-existing relationships between two or more partnership leaders | ● One or more key leaders met for first time during proposal development or after grant notification |
Relationship of partnership leaders with VA Central Office | ● Longstanding pre-existing relationships between partnership leaders and VA’s Office of Academic Affiliations | ● Leaders of proposed partnerships were unknown to OAA staff prior to submission |
Funds from VANA grant to support faculty salaries | ● Clear understanding at both institutions about procedures to disburse VA grant funds for faculty salaries | ● Pervasive lack of knowledge at both institutions about the local financial mechanisms used to spend grant funds |
● Lack of knowledge about grant disbursement process or lack of supportive resources to understand it |