Tolerator | Preventer | Concerner | |
---|---|---|---|
Vision on support | ● Relationship only with client | ● CG is an ally of the MHN | ● Focus is on fostering the quality of life: Wellbeing of CG, the client and their interrelatedness |
● Care for client is main focus | |||
● CG is potential obstacle to reaching client goals | ● Wellbeing of CG and Cl is interrelated | ||
● Assumption that family ties are irreversibly weak | ● Systemic approach is needed | ||
Interpretation of role and responsibility | ● Responsible for treatment environment | ● To support CG as teammate by preventing excessive burden in order to prevent drop out | ● Support both CG and Cl |
● Modelling of appropriate CG behaviour | ● Observe CG-client relationship and offer practical solutions | ● Focus on relieving the suffering of both CG and the Cl and reaching full potential of both | |
● CG Problems referred to other professionals if needed | ● Avoid being dragged into the situation | ● Presence comes before problem-solving | |
Acknowledgement of relationship with the caregiver | ● Keeping distance | ● Equal, professional and trusting relationship | ● Aims at building a trusting, reciprocal, non-hierarchical relationship with CG and Cl |
● Contact only in order to gain access to client and gain information about client illness (manifestation) | ● Maintaining the CG-MHN relationship is fostered by recognizable narratives as well as the CG’s empathy for the client’s situation and by working together | ● CG is viewed as expert | |
● Relationship is hampered by CG refusing assistance | ● Relationship is based on understanding the CG as a person | ||
● Present without prejudices | |||
Defining CG needs | ● Defining CG needs is not an issue | ● Focus on problems with caregiving tasks and not on CG emotions | ● Emotional impact of the mental illness on expectations, treat to integrity, dreams and life course of both the caregiver and the client |
● No systematic assessment of CG needs | ● Assess the impact on the interrelatedness and mutual dependence of the CG and Cl | ||
● Support based on assumptions about CG needs rather than facts | ● Assessment by open and empathic listening to the CG narratives | ||
● Assessment in the absence of Cl is needed | |||
Interventions that meet the CG’s needs | ● Information and modelling concerning behaviour preferred to reach clients’ goals | ● Support by problem oriented and instrumental advice | ● Presence is most important intervention |
● Listening to CG stories | ● MHN is mediator rather than decision maker | ||
● Acts more pro-actively as relationship deepens | ● Improvement of mutual communication, problem-solving strategies and personal development | ||
● In the case of CG-client conflict in goals CG support is left to colleague |