Evaluation of person-centred care after hip replacement-a controlled before and after study on the effects of fear of movement and self-efficacy compared to standard care

BMC Nursing

Table 1 Patient baseline data collected before surgery

Data	Control n = 138	gPCC n = 128	P
Female/male	89/49	83/45	0.9
Mean age	66	68	0.1
Standard Deviation	13,9	12	0.1
Living
with someone	90	68	0.6
alone	46	56	0.6
Employment status
Employed	32	33	0.2
Retired	84	79
Disability pension	16	5
Other	3	6
Contact with relatives
Weekly	129	120	0.8
Weekly to monthly	6	4
< monthly	2	2
Home nursing
Yes	1	4	0.1
No	132	120	0.1
Emergency medical alarm at home
Yes	15	9	0.7
No	97	113	0.7
Number of co-morbidities
Median	1	1	0.06
Min	0	0
Max	6	9
ASA grade
1	36	22	0.1
2	75	69
3	27	16
Using naturopathic preparation
Yes	116	107	1.0
No	19	17	1.0
Type of living
Flat	62	74	0.02*
House	75	52
Service flat	1	2
Need of assistance from relative
Yes	71	67	1.0
No	57	54	1.0
Need of community home help
None	120	115	0.7
Once a week	6	6
Daily or more	7	4
Assistive aids for personal use such as pincers, seat cushions and so on
Yes	46	51	0.4
No	44	61	0.4
Pre-fracture independence^b
80–100 %	132	117	0.9
60–79 %	3	7
< 60 %	3	3
Mean	92	92
SD	13	16
Type of walking aid
None	44	42	0.5
Crutches	64	54
Walking frame	14	19
Wheel chair	3	4
Previous hip replacement in contralateral hip
Yes	47	32	0.4
No	91	95	0.4
Feeling healthy
Yes	78	77	0.7
No	19	16	0.7

^aCeder scale
^bFunctional Recovery Scale [40]
*significant
The missing data for some of the variables were not regarded to impact the overall study results
gPCC Gothenburg person-centred care