Skip to main content

Table 5 Observed (a) and latent variables (b) of the retested model (nā€‰=ā€‰751)

From: Predictors of burnout, work engagement and nurse reported job outcomes and quality of care: a mixed method study

Burnout:

Loading model 1

Loading model 2

Emotional exhaustion (b) (Cronbachā€™s alpha:. 90)

1

I feel emotionally drained from my work (a).

.86

Ā 

2

I feel used up at the end of the workday (a).

.85

Ā 

14

I feel Iā€™m working too hard on my job (a).

.67

Ā 

Depersonalisation (b) (Cronbachā€™s alpha:. 66)

10

Iā€™ve become more callous toward people since I took this job (a)

.51

Ā 

11

I worry that this job hardening me emotionally (a)

.73

Ā 

22

I feel patients blame me for some of their problems (a)

39

Ā 

Personal accomplishment (b) (Cronbachā€™s alpha: .69)

17

I can easily create a relaxed atmosphere with my patients (a).

.60

Ā 

18

I feel exhilarated after working closely with my patients (a).

.85

Ā 

19

I have accomplished many worthwhile things in this job (a).

.67

Ā 

Work engagement:

Vigor (b) (Cronbachā€™s alpha: .86)

2

At my job, I feel strong and vigorous (a).

Ā 

.82

5

When I get up in the morning, I feel like going to work (a).

.82

Dedication (b): (Cronbachā€™s alpha: .82)

3

I am enthusiastic about my job (a).

Ā 

.87

4

My job inspires me (a).

Ā 

.73

Absorption (b) (Cronbachā€™s alpha:. 64)

6

I feel happy when I am working intensely (a)a.

Ā 

.72

9

I am immersed in my work (a).

Ā 

.60

Outcome variables

Job outcomes: (b) (Cronbachā€™s alpha: .32)b

1

Job satisfaction (a).

.60

.64

2

Intention to stay in the hospital (a).

.39

.37

3

Intention to stay in nursing (a).

.28

.26

Nurse ā€“ assessed quality of care (b) (Cronbachā€™s alpha: .73)

1

At the current unit (a).

.88

.88

2

At the last shift (a).

.77

.77

3

In the hospital the last year (a).

.49

.49

  1. aSuperior fit indices were established by replacing one item of the absorption dimension. bJob outcomesā€™ Cronbachā€™s alpha coefficient was in our studies low. Inter-item correlations, an alternative measurement technique assessing internal consistency [13], for the indicators of the job outcome dimension ranged from fair to moderate with values between .15 and .21 [47]