Skip to main content

Table 2 Description of EIDM competence attributes measures across setting, population (35 measures)

From: Measures of evidence-informed decision-making competence attributes: a psychometric systematic review

Name of measure

(n = # of studies)

[related citations]

Purpose of measure and description

Setting

Population

EIDM Competence Attributes

Primary care

Acute care

Public health

Home health

Long-term

Other

Not reported

RNs

APNs

RPNs/LPNs

Does not specify

Knowledge

Skills

Attitudes/Belief

Behaviours

FOUR EIDM COMPETENCE ATTRIBUTES MEASURED (n = 3)

Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (EBPQ)

(n = 36 studies)

[30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66]

A 24-item self-report measure that assesses knowledge, practice, and attitudes toward evidence-based practice (EBP). Knowledge/skills (14 items) are assessed collectively using a 7-point scale (1 = poor to 7 = best). Practice is assessed with six items with a scale to determine the frequency with which that item has been completed over the past year on a 7-point scale ranging from never to frequently. Attitudes are assessed using four items also on a 7-point scale with higher scores indicating more positive attitudes towards EBP.

  

 

School Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (SN-EBP)

(n = 1 study)

[67]

A measure with the most applicable categories: EBP (21 items rated from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree); Computer use (7 items rated from 1 = avoid all together to 4 = skillfull); Information sources (10 items rated from 1 = never to 4 = all the time)

  

    

   

Self-developed measure by Chiu et al. (2010)

(n = 1 study)

[68]

A self-report measure to assess EBP beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, skills, behaviours and barriers. Respondents rate agreement on a 5-point Likert scale (from strongly agree to strongly disagree). EBP behaviours is defined by identifying the frequency of access to online databases.

 

        

THREE EIDM COMPETENCE ATTRIBUTES MEASURED (n = 7)

Johns Hopkins Nursing EBP Assessment Survey

(n = 1 study)

[69]

An online self-report survey in which respondents were asked to rate their confidence in ability to achieve specific EBP competencies on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 = completed disagree to 6 = completely agree (I feel confident I can…).

 

     

   

 

Persian translated EBP measure

(n = 1 study)

[70]

A four-part self-report measure combining items from various existing measures to assess EBP knowledge, attitudes, and practice.

 

     

   

 

Self-developed measure by Yip et al.

(n = 1 study)

[71]

Measure consisting of three sections with most applicable: beliefs and attitudes (5 items) rated on a Likert scale with highest score of 5 = strongly agree and knowledge and skills (9 items) rated on Likert scale with highest score of 5 = excellent.

 

     

   

 

Self-developed measure by Chew et al.

(n = 1 study)

[72]

Self-report measure that assesses EBP attitude and knowledge (5 items) and resource utilization when searching for EBP (3 items).

      

   

 

Self-developed EBP measure by Melnyk et al. (2004)

(n = 1 study)

[73]

Self-report measure with the most applicable domains: Seven items measuring knowledge, beliefs, extent of EBP on a scale from 0 (nothing, not at all) to 100 (expert, all); Nine dichotomous items about EBP implementation (e.g. Do you currently use Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews)

      

   

 

Modified Evidence-Based Nursing Education Questionnaire (EBEQ)

(n = 1 study)

[74]

A 45-item self-report measure focused on assessing beliefs, knowledge, and self-perceived ability in EBP implementation divided into five domains: 1) knowledge 2) finding and reviewing evidence, 3) clinical practices, 4) change in clinical strategies/practices, and 5) finding and judging evidence. Response scale is a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Higher scores are associated with positive beliefs, greater knowledge and self-perceived ability for EBP implementation.

      

  

 

Quick EBP VIK (Values, Implementation, Knowledge) Survey

(n = 2 studies)

[75, 76]

A 25-item self-report survey that assesses values, implementation and knowledge of EBP. Values (8 items) are assessed using a 5-point scale from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. Implementation (8 items) is assessed by indicating the frequency with which an EBP activity has been performed on a 5-point scale in the last 12 months (1 = none; 2 = 1 or 2 times; 3 = 3–5 times; 4 = 6–10 times; 5 = more than 10 times). Knowledge (9 items) is assessed on a 5-point scale for each item ranging from 1 = not at all knowledgeable; 2 = minimally knowledgeable; 3 = knowledgeable; 4 = very knowledgeable; 5 = extremely knowledgeable/expert.

 

     

 

 

TWO EIDM COMPETENCE ATTRIBUTES MEASURED (n = 6)

Self-developed measure by Barako et al.

(n = 1 study)

[77]

Self-report measure that assesses numerous domains but most applicable are attitudes toward EBP (7 items) and EBP application (1 item) with a dichotomous response of either ‘fully practice’ or ‘don’t fully practice’.

 

        

  

EBP measure developed by Majid et al. [78]

(n = 2 studies)

[35, 79]

A self-report measure that assesses attitude towards EBP, skills in performing EBP activities, training needs, and supporting factors and barriers in EBP implementation. Most applicable is attitudes (5-items) measured on a 5-point scale from strongly disagree to strongly agree. EBP skills are assessed (9 items) using a 5-point scale ranging from 1 = poor to 5 = excellent.

 

     

  

 

 

Modified Stevens EBP Readiness Inventory (ERI) (Finnish ERI)

(n = 1 study)

[80]

A 25-item measure divided into two sections: 1) Consists of 20 EBP competencies which respondents rate their confidence in their ability to perform the competency (scored on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = very little confidence to 6 = a great deal of confidence in employing EBP); and 2) 15 multiple choice item to assess knowledge about major concepts in EBP. These are scored based on number of correct questions ranging from 0 to 15.

 

     

   

  

Self-developed measure by Gerrish et al.

(n = 1 study)

[81]

A self-report measure. Many areas covered but most applicable: understanding of EBP (respondents provide open-text description of EBP understanding), 11-items for self-assessment of EBP knowledge and skills (rated on a 5-point ordinal scale (complete beginner to expert).

      

  

  

Knowledge and Skills in Evidence-Based Nursing (KS-EBN)

(n = 1 study)

[82]

A 10-item short answer, multiple choice, and ranking measure to assess EBP nursing knowledge and skills. Each question is awarded a specific point score. Range of scores are from 0 to 12.

 

        

  

Adapted Fresno Test

(n = 1 study)

[83]

A measure used to assess EBP knowledge and skills using three different pediatric nursing case scenarios. The questions relate to the case scenario and consist of both open-ended and close-ended questions. Questions are scored on a scale from 0 to 212 with higher scores indicating greater EBP knowledge and skill.

 

     

   

  

ONE EIDM COMPETENCE ATTRIBUTE MEASURED (n = 19)

Evidence-based Practice Implementation Scale

(n = 35 studies)

[50, 59, 63, 84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119]

An 18-item self-report measure that assesses the extent of EBP implementation. Response scale is on a 5-point frequency scale. Respondents identify the frequency (in past 8 weeks) with which they have performed that item. Scale ranges from 0 = 0 times to 4 = more than 8 times. Total score ranges from 0 to 72.

 

   

Self-developed measure by Bostrom et al.

(n = 1 study)

[120]

Six item measure that assesses the extent to which nurses practice EBP. Nurses respond to each item by answering the question: “To what extent do you perform the following tasks in your work as a nurse?” Each item is rated on a 4-point scale (1 = to a very low extent, 2 = to a low extent, 3 = to a high extent, 4 = to a very high extent).

     

      

Self-developed measure by Kim et al.

(1 study)

[48]

Self-report 7-item measure that assesses perceived ability to follow EBP steps. Responses are rated on a 5-point Likert scale based on Benner’s model (1 = novice, 2 = advanced beginner, 3 = competent, 4 = proficient, 5 = expert).

 

     

      

Evidence-Based Practice Confidence Scale (EPIC)

(n = 1 study)

[31, 32]

An 11-item self-report measure in which respondents rate the confidence in their ability to perform specific EBP activities/steps using an 11-point scale ranging from 0 to 100.

 

     

      

EBP Competency Tool *identified from content expert

(n = 1 study)

[10]

A self-report measure of 24 EBP competencies (items). Response scale consists of participants rating competency level on a 4-point Likert scale: 1 (not at all competent), 2 (need improvement), 3 (competent), and 4 (highly competent). Possible scores range from 0 to 96.

 

   

 

     

Self-developed measure by Gerrish et al.

(n = 1 study)

[121]

A self-report measure with four sections. The most applicable section is the self-assessment of nurses’ skills related to finding, reviewing, and using different evidence sources (6 items). These are ranked on a 5-point scale from 1 = complete beginner to 5 = expert.

 

        

 

  

Developing Evidence-based practice questionnaire

(n = 6 studies)

[8, 122,123,124,125,126]

A self-report measure aimed to identify factors that influence the development of EBP. Forty-nine items are divided into five sections. Most applicable section is: self-assessment of skills in finding and reviewing evidence (eight items) which are scored on a 5-point scale from 1 = complete beginner to 5 = expert.

   

 

  

Information literacy tool

(n = 1 study)

[59]

Nine questions to assess information searching ability.

 

     

    

  

Evidence-based Practice Beliefs Scale

(n = 42 studies)

[50, 59, 63, 83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119, 127,128,129,130,131,132,133]

A 16-item self-report measure that assesses beliefs about the value of EBP and ability in implementing it. Response scale is a 5-point Likert scale to rate agreement level (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). Total scores can range between 16 and 80.

 

  

 

Modified Korean Evidence-Based Medicine questionnaire

(n = 1 study)

[134]

A 23 item self-report measure that assesses participants’ perceptions (13 items), attitudes (9 items) and utilization intention (1 item) of evidence-based nursing (EBN). Participants respond on a 4-point Likert scale for perceptions and attitudes and a 3-point Likert scale for intention to use EBN to indicate their agreement with the statement (‘strongly disagree’ to ‘strongly agree’).

 

     

     

 

Evidence-Based Practice Attitudes Scale (EBPAS)

(n = 1 study)

[31, 32]

An 18-item self-report scale to determine attitudes toward adopting EBP. Response for each item indicate agreement level and include: 0 = not at all; 1 = to a slight extent; 2 = to a moderate extent; 3 = to a great extent; 4 = to a very great extent.

 

     

     

 

Attitudes to Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire

(n = 1 study) [33]

A self-report survey (originally 26-items), with 17 items used to assess attitudes/barriers toward EBP rated on a 5-point Likert scale.

 

        

  

 

Evidence-Based Nursing Attitude Questionnaire (EBNAQ)

(n = 2 studies)

[135, 136]

A 15-item self-report measure that assesses attitudes towards evidence-based nursing (EBN) as it relates to the benefits of EBN, behaviours/intentions in participating in EBN, and importance level ascribed to EBN. Response scale rates the level of agreement with each item on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree.

 

   

     

 

Nurses’ Attitudes Toward EBP Scale (NATES)

(n = 1 study)

[137]

An 11-item self-report measure used to assess EBP attitudes and beliefs. Response scale is a 5-point Likert scale to assess agreement (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). Score ranges from 5 to 55 with higher scores indicating more positive attitudes related to EBP.

 

     

     

 

Single item measure for EBP knowledge by Skela-Savic et al.

(n = 1 study) [109]

One self-report item in which respondents are asked to rate their EBP knowledge on a 5-point scale from 1 = insufficient to 5 = excellent.

 

     

   

   

Perceived EBP Knowledge Measure

(1 study)

[137]

A 3-item measure that assesses a nurse’s perception of having enough knowledge, skills, and access to resources to engage in EBP. Each item is scored on an agreement scale (strongly disagree = 1 to strongly agree = 5). Total scores range from 3 to 15 with higher scores denoting increased perception of EBP knowledge.

 

     

   

   

Evidence-Based Practice Knowledge

Assessment in Nursing (EKAN)

(n = 1 study) [45]

A 20-item multiple choice measure that assesses EBP knowledge. Total number correct is scored out of 20.

 

     

   

   

Knowledge Assessment Test (KAT)

(1 study) [66]

Objective measure assessing EBP knowledge.

      

   

   

Core Knowledge Questionnaire

(1 study) [62]

A 12-item multiple choice question test to measure EBP knowledge.

 

     

   

   

Total # of Measures

 

9

31

4

4

1

4

5

26

7

4

13

19

15

17

13

  1. Note: In some cases, measures cross multiple settings, populations, and attributes, therefore, total number of measures will not add to 35
  2. RN: Registered Nurse
  3. APN: Advanced Practice Nurse (e.g., Nurse Practitioner)
  4. RPN: Registered Practice Nurse
  5. LPN: Licensed Practical Nurse