Skip to main content

Table 3 Dıfferences ın Students’ perceptions about broader aspects of patient safety (range = 1–5)

From: The knowledge about patient safety among undergraduate nurse students in Cyprus and Greece: a comparative study

 

Cyprus

(n = 197)

Greece

(n = 289)

Independent samples t-tests

3rd year

(n = 234)

4th year

(n = 252)

Independent samples t-tests

Broader aspects on patient safety

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

t

p *

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

t

p *

Total

4.0 (0.6)

3.3 (0.6)

1

0.000

3.5 (0.7)

3.7 (0.7)

−3.099

0.002

My scope of practice was very clear to me

3.9 (1.0)

2.9 (1.1)

10.978

< 0,001

3.2 (1.2)

3.4 (1.2)

−1.574

0.116

There is consistency in how patient safety issues

are dealt with by clinical educator in the clinical setting

3.8 (0.9)

3.0 (1.0)

9.566

< 0,001

3.3 (1.0)

3.4 (1.0)

−1.205

0.229

I had sufficient opportunity to learn and interact with members of interdisciplinary teams’

4.0 (0.9)

3.5 (1.1)

5.776

< 0,001

3.5 (1.0)

3.9 (1.0)

−4.226

0.001

I gained a solid understanding that reporting adverse events and close calls can lead to change and can reduce reoccurrence of events

4.3 (0.7)

3.8 (0.9)

6.096

< 0,001

3.9 (0.9)

4.0 (0.8)

−1.228

0.220

‘Patient safety is well integrated into the overall program

4.0 (0.9)

3.4 (0.9)

7.78

< 0,001

3.6 (0.9)

3.7 (1.0)

−1.547

0.123

Clinical aspects of patient safety are well covered in our program (e.g. hand hygiene, medication)

4.3 (0.8)

3.5 (1.0)

9.657

< 0,001

3.8 (1.1)

4.0 (1.0)

−1.794

0.073

“System” aspects of patient safety are well covered in our program (e.g. organization, management or the work environment)

3.4 (0.9)

3.2 (1.0)

8.021

<0,001

3.3 (1.0)

3.7 (0.9)

−3.999

0.001

  1. *Sig. (2-tailed)