|
Frameworks
|
Description of the purpose (and the addressed question(s)
|
Description of the application setting
|
Description of the technology (area)
|
Clarity/ complexity of illustration
|
Visualization of connections and relationships within the framework
|
Transparent definitions of terms and key concepts
|
Concrete application strategy and instructions for use
|
Instruction on how the results can be interpreted
|
Transparency of development process
|
Reflection of the limitations of the framework
|
Transferability of the framework (Settings, technologies, questions)
|
+
|
–
|
+/−
|
|
Health Technology Adoption Framework [33]
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+/−
|
9
|
1
|
1
|
|
Clinical Information Systems Success Model (CISSM) [21]
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
+/−
|
9
|
1
|
1
|
|
Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability Framework (NASSS Framework) [34]
|
+
|
+/−
|
+/−
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+/−
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
8
|
0
|
3
|
|
Health Information Technology Evaluation Framework (HITREF) [26]
|
+
|
+/−
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
+
|
–
|
+
|
8
|
2
|
1
|
|
Evaluation Framework for Fit-For-Purpose Connected Sensor Technologies [19]
|
+
|
+/−
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
+
|
8
|
2
|
1
|
|
Hospital Information System Success Framework [27]
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
–
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
8
|
3
|
0
|
|
Adapted nursing care performance framework [30]
|
+
|
+/−
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
+/−
|
–
|
+
|
+
|
7
|
2
|
2
|
|
The layered telemedicine implementation model [23]
|
+
|
+/−
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+/−
|
–
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
7
|
2
|
2
|
|
Model for Assessment of Telemedicine (MAST Manual) [31]
|
+
|
+/−
|
+
|
–
|
–
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
7
|
3
|
1
|
|
Health technology assessment framework for digital healthcare services (Digi HTA) [20]
|
+
|
+/−
|
+
|
–
|
–
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
+
|
7
|
3
|
1
|
|
Infoway benefits evaluation Framework [25]
|
+
|
+/−
|
+/−
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
–
|
+
|
–
|
+
|
6
|
3
|
2
|
|
Design and Evaluation of DHI Framework [14]
|
+
|
+/−
|
+/−
|
–
|
–
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
6
|
3
|
2
|
|
RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) (expanded to clinical informatics)) [35]
|
+
|
+/−
|
+/−
|
–
|
–
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
+
|
6
|
3
|
2
|
|
Development of an Evaluation Framework for Health Information Systems (DIPSA Framework) [28]
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
–
|
+
|
–
|
–
|
+
|
–
|
+
|
6
|
5
|
0
|
|
Khoja–Durrani–Scott Framework for e-Health Evaluation [22]
|
+
|
+/−
|
+/−
|
–
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
–
|
+
|
–
|
+
|
5
|
4
|
2
|
|
Digital Health Score Card [32]
|
+
|
+/−
|
+/−
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
4
|
5
|
2
|
|
Human, Organization, Process and Technology-fit (HOPT-FIT) [29]
|
+
|
+/−
|
+
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
4
|
6
|
1
|
|
Comprehensive evaluation framework for telemedicine implementation [24]
|
+
|
+/−
|
+
|
+
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
–
|
3
|
7
|
1
|
