Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic characteristics and single factor analysis of coping abilities of clinic nursing students (N = 1992)

From: Factors influencing the coping abilities in clinic nursing students under public health emergency (COVID-19): a cross-sectional study

Demographic characteristics n(%) Scores of positive coping dimension (Mean ± SD) Scores of negative coping dimension (Mean ± SD) Pairwise comparison
Sex
 Male 142 (7.13) 1.92 ± 0.47** 1.11 ± 0.57
 Female 1850 (92.87) 2.15 ± 0.59 1.08 ± 0.51
Education
 Junior colleges 1434 (71.99) 2.15 ± 0.59* 1.09 ± 0.53
 Undergraduate colleges 558 (28.01) 2.00 ± 0.56 1.05 ± 0.47
Place of Residence
 City 858 (43.07) 2.06 ± 0.61 1.11 ± 0.52* There were statistically significant differences between the “city” and “rural” groups
 Township 567 (28.46) 2.03 ± 0.57 1.08 ± 0.53
 Rural 567 (28.46) 2.01 ± 0.55 1.04 ± 0.49
Infected patients around
 With 1557 (78.16) 2.05 ± 0.57* 1.07 ± 0.52*
 Without 435 (21.84) 1.89 ± 0.62 1.12 ± 0.50
Severity of epidemic around
 No epidemic 308 (15.46) 2.08 ± 0.60 1.06 ± 0.59* There were statistically significant differences between the “very serious” and other groups
 Not serious 613 (30.77) 2.05 ± 0.55 1.07 ± 0.52
 Not very serious 736 (36.95) 2.01 ± 0.59 1.06 ± 0.50
 Serious 283 (14.21) 2.05 ± 0.59 1.12 ± 0.46
 Very serious 52 (2.61) 1.93 ± 0.66 1.30 ± 0.54
Hospital grade
 Class III 156 (7.83) 1.99 ± 0.57 1.13 ± 0.52
 Class II 103 (5.17) 1.97 ± 0.65 1.13 ± 0.56
 Class I 1733 (87.00) 2.05 ± 0.58 1.07 ± 0.51
Practice hospital as designated treatment unit
 YES 1043 (52.36) 2.28 ± 0.59** 1.09 ± 0.54 There were statistically significant differences between the “yes” and the other groups
 NO 512 (25.70) 2.00 ± 0.56 1.06 ± 0.47
 Not clear 437 (21.94) 1.97 ± 0.59 1.08 ± 0.52
Total 2.04 ± 0.58 1.08 ± 0.52  
  1. *:P<0.05; **:P<0.01