From: Development and validity of the Korea psychiatric triage algorithm
No. | Item | CVI |
---|---|---|
1. | Is it reasonable to distinguish between mental and physical problems with the patient’s chief complaint? | .6 |
2. | Is it appropriate to confirm that the physical problem of the patient who came to the emergency room is the result of suicide attempt? | .9 |
2–1. | Is it reasonable to classify an emergency if a physical problem is the result of a suicide attempt? | 1.0 |
2–2. | Is it reasonable to use KTAS if physical problems are not the result of suicide attempts? | 1.0 |
3. | If aggressive behavior is observed, is it reasonable to classify as urgent? | 1.0 |
3–1. | Is it reasonable to have a psychiatrist’s face-to-face medical treatment immediately in an urgent? | .8 |
4. | Is it reasonable to classify as an emergency if you have severe agitation / suicide attempts? | 1.0 |
4–1. | The criteria for severe agitation are based on the Excited Component of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Is the classifier valid? | 1.0 |
4–2. | Is it appropriate to have a psychiatrist visit in 15 to 30 min in an emergency? | .7 |
4–3. | Is it appropriate to report to an emergency medical specialist if an emergency is found that causes physical damage due to suicide attempts? | .9 |
5. | Is it reasonable to classify as a para-emergency if you show mild agitation? | 1.0 |
5–1. | The criteria for mild agitation are based on the Excited Component of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Is the classifier valid? | 1.0 |
5–2. | Is it reasonable to have a psychiatrist visit within 30 to 60 min if you are para-emergency? | .7 |
6. | Is the non-emergency classifier valid? | 1.0 |
6–1. | If it is non-emergency, is it reasonable to have a psychiatrist visit within 60 to 120 min? | .6 |
6–2. | If it is non-emergency, is it reasonable to make a discharge or outpatient appointment if the patient does not complain of a subjective psychiatric emergency? | 1.0 |