From: A peer learning intervention in workplace introduction - managers’ and new graduates’ perspectives
Intervention week 1, 2 | Intervention week 3 | Intervention week 4–6 | Intervention week 4–12 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The intervention | The pair worked the same shift, had joint responsibility for a group of patients and were introduced by one preceptor Daily joint scheduled reflection | The pair worked the same shift, but in contrast to the first 2 weeks they were solely responsible for a care team located next to each other Daily joint scheduled reflection. | Scheduled on the same shift twice a week | Joint reflection twice a week |
aIntervention fidelity | Nine pairs of new graduates had joint responsibility for a care team for 2 weeks. Two pairs reported sickness in the pair. All pairs had daily joint reflection when working together. | One pair’s care team was not located next to each other One participant changed the scheme 2 days due to personal reasons Two pairs occasionally forgot or did not take the time to reflect every day | Ten pairs were scheduled the same shift twice a week. One pair had no shifts together. | Eight pairs had scheduled joint reflection twice a week between weeks 4 and 10. One pair reported they had joint reflection once a week between weeks 4 and 12. During the last 2 weeks three pairs had scheduled joint reflection twice a week. Reported reasons not to reflect were; high workload, sick leave, lack of time, one in the pair took a vacation |