Skip to main content

Table 3 The students’ feedback on simulation design characteristics: the Chinese version of the Jeffries Simulation Design Scale (n = 104)

From: Effects of a standardized patient-based simulation in anaphylactic shock management for new graduate nurses

Dimensions

Items

1

2

3

4

5

Satisfaction rate (%)

The scores for each of the 5 dimensions (n = 104)

Objectives/information

I had adequate pre-training preparation and I was encouraged to participate.

0

0

2

7

95

98.08

24.49 ± 1.18

I was provided clear and definite teaching goals.

0

0

1

5

98

99.04

During the simulation teaching, I was provided enough clinical information to facilitate me to solve the clinical problems.

0

0

3

4

97

97.12

I was provided with enough clinical information during simulation training.

0

1

2

2

99

97.12

The examples during teaching training have prepared me to understand simulation training.

0

2

4

2

96

94.23

Support

I was provided adequate support and help during the simulation training.

0

0

2

1

101

98.08

19.78 ± 0.59

Teachers can identify my needs when I need them.

0

0

2

2

100

98.08

Teachers have been very helpful during the simulation training.

0

0

1

2

101

99.04

I had all the support during my entire training.

0

0

2

4

98

98.08

Problem-solving

My problem-solving skills have improved after this simulation training.

0

0

0

6

98

100

24.58 ± 0.78

I was encouraged to search all the possibilities for solving problems during this simulation training.

0

1

3

5

95

96.15

This simulation training was designed according to my knowledge and clinical skills.

0

0

2

2

100

98.08

Simulation teaching has provided opportunities for me to improve my clinical assessment and nursing skills.

0

0

3

4

97

97.12

Simulation training has provided me with constructive feedback upon making clinical nursing goals.

0

0

2

4

98

98.08

Feedback

Structured and well-organized feedback.

0

0

0

5

99

100

19.76 ± 0.51

I was giving feedback promptly during simulation training.

0

0

2

5

97

98.08

I was allowed to analyze my clinical performance during the feedback session.

0

0

1

3

100

99.04

I was given feedback from training preceptors after simulation teaching finished.

0

0

0

6

98

100

Fidelity

This simulation training was imitated by a real clinical environment.

0

1

3

2

98

96.15

9.84 ± 0.52

This simulation training is real to me.

0

0

1

4

99

99.04

  1. Items were rated on a five-point scale ranging from “Strongly disagree (1)” to “Strongly agree (5)”