The effect of interprofessional education on interprofessional professionalism behaviors of the surgical team members

Table 3 The participants’ scores of interprofessional professionalism behaviors in the intervention and control groups before and after the intervention

Domains	Group	Pre-Test	1^ST Post- Test	2^nd Post-Test	Crude P-Value*	Adjusted** P-Value	Eta-Square
Domains	Group	Mean(SD)	Mean(SD)	Mean(SD)	Crude P-Value*	Adjusted** P-Value	Eta-Square
Communication	Intervention	1.27 (0.19)	2.68 (0.31)	2.62 (0.29)	< 0.001	< 0.001	0.85
Communication	Control	1.16 (0.17)	1.22 (0.16)	1.14 (0.12)	< 0.001	< 0.001	0.85
Respect	Intervention	1.14 (0.13)	2.65 (0.30)	2.61 (0.29)	0.004	< 0.001	0.87
Respect	Control	1.18 (0.23)	1.19 (0.15)	1.16 (1.16)	0.004	< 0.001	0.87
Altruism And Empathy	Intervention	1.51 (0.23)	2.46 (0.32)	2.40 (0.28)	0.027	< 0.001	0.82
Altruism And Empathy	Control	1.43 (0.24)	1.19 (0.16)	1.13 (0.11)	0.027	< 0.001	0.82
Excellence	Intervention	1.11 (0.11)	2.56 (0.29)	2.52 (0.27)	< 0.001	< 0.001	0.87
Excellence	Control	1.07 (0.11)	1.09 (0.09)	1.07 (0.09)	< 0.001	< 0.001	0.87
Total	Intervention	1.25 (0.12)	2.59 (0.26)	2.54 (0.24)	< 0.001	< 0.001	0.89
Total	Control	1.21 (0.1)	1.17 (0.08)	1.13 (0.07)	< 0.001	< 0.001	0.89

^* Baseline measurements adjusted Comparison between intervention and control groups based on Repeated Measure ANOVA test (RM-ANOVA) is significant at the level of 0.05. The p-value of interaction in RM-ANOVA was reported
^** Adjusted on age, sex, profession and baseline measurements

ISSN: 1472-6955