No concern | Remained similar | Decreased | Increased to some extent | Increased notably | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Background information | ||||||
Age group, n = 352 | ||||||
< 40 | 8.8 | 5.9 | 2.9 | 44.1 | 38.2 | .670 |
40–49 | 3.6 | 8.9 | 1.8 | 35.7 | 50.0 | |
50–59 | 5.6 | 13.6 | 0.0 | 39.2 | 41.6 | |
60–69 | 5.3 | 13.7 | 4.2 | 36.8 | 40.0 | |
70 + | 2.4 | 21.4 | 2.4 | 35.7 | 38.1 | |
Gender, n = 364 | ||||||
Female | 5.0 | 12.1 | 1.5 | 37.5 | 44.0 | .058 |
Male | 7.3 | 24.4 | 4.9 | 36.6 | 26.8 | |
Relation to person living in a nursing home, n = 366 | ||||||
Spouse | 2.6 | 13.2 | 2.6 | 31.6 | 50.0 | .855 |
Child | 5.3 | 13.6 | 2.1 | 35.8 | 43.2 | |
Sibling | 0.0 | 28.6 | 0.0 | 35.7 | 35.7 | |
Grandchild | 7.4 | 11.1 | 0.0 | 59.3 | 22.2 | |
Child-in-law | 7.1 | 7.1 | 0.0 | 42.9 | 42.9 | |
Other | 6.7 | 13.3 | 3.3 | 36.7 | 40.0 | |
Length of residence in a nursing home, n = 366 | ||||||
< 3 months | 2.9 | 22.9 | 8.6 | 17.1 | 48.6 | .028 |
3–6 months | 7.7 | 5.1 | 5.1 | 46.2 | 35.9 | |
6 months – 1 year | 9.1 | 18.2 | 0.0 | 34.1 | 38.6 | |
1–2 years | 6.3 | 10.0 | 0.0 | 37.5 | 46.3 | |
> 2 years | 3.6 | 14.3 | 1.2 | 40.5 | 40.5 | |
Distance from the nursing home, n = 366 | ||||||
< 5 km | 4.0 | 12.1 | 1.6 | 37.1 | 45.2 | .597 |
5–20 km | 6.0 | 18.8 | 2.6 | 32.5 | 40.2 | |
> 20 km | 5.6 | 10.4 | 1.6 | 42.4 | 40.0 | |
Before the visiting ban | ||||||
Frequency of visits to the nursing home, n = 359 | ||||||
Almost every day | 3.9 | 11.8 | 2.0 | 19.6 | 62.7 | .012 |
At least twice a week | 5.8 | 11.6 | 0.0 | 39.5 | 43.0 | |
About once a week | 2.8 | 16.7 | 2.8 | 39.8 | 38.0 | |
Every second week | 9.4 | 15.1 | 0.0 | 32.1 | 43.4 | |
Once a month | 4.9 | 14.6 | 0.0 | 56.1 | 24.4 | |
Less than once a month | 10.0 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 45.0 | 30.0 | |
Happy with the frequency of visits before the visiting ban, n = 357 | ||||||
Yes | 4.6 | 15.1 | 0.7 | 38.0 | 41.5 | .122 |
Too often | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 33.3 | 33.3 | |
Too rarely | 7.2 | 8.7 | 4.3 | 39.1 | 40.6 | |
So concerned about the wellbeing of a close one that their wellbeing had deteriorated before the visiting ban, n = 363 | ||||||
Yes | 2.5 | 8.6 | 4.9 | 33.3 | 50.6 | .025 |
No | 6.0 | 15.2 | 1.1 | 39.0 | 38.7 | |
During the visiting ban | ||||||
Enough contacts during the visiting ban, n = 365 | ||||||
Yes | 14.0 | 30.2 | 4.7 | 40.7 | 10.5 | < .001 |
No | 2.5 | 8.6 | 1.1 | 36.2 | 51.6 | |
Noticed changes in the wellbeing of a close one, n = 357 | ||||||
Yes | 2.2 | 6.2 | 2.2 | 34.2 | 55.1 | < .001 |
No | 10.6 | 27.3 | 1.5 | 43.2 | 17.4 | |
Received enough information on the wellbeing of a close one, n = 352 | ||||||
Yes | 6.8 | 19.6 | 2.6 | 40.9 | 30.2 | < .001 |
No | 1.7 | 3.4 | 0.9 | 29.1 | 65.0 | |
Safety, n = 352 | ||||||
Yes | 7.8 | 21.8 | 2.4 | 42.7 | 25.2 | < .001 |
No | 0.7 | 3.4 | 1.4 | 29.5 | 65.1 | |
Daily life, n = 355 | ||||||
Yes | 8.4 | 22.0 | 2.1 | 42.4 | 25.1 | < .001 |
No | 0.6 | 4.9 | 1.8 | 30.5 | 62.2 | |
Possibilities to keep in touch, n = 355 | ||||||
Yes | 7.2 | 21.2 | 1.9 | 38.5 | 31.3 | < .001 |
No | 2.0 | 4.1 | 2.0 | 34.0 | 57.8 | |
Changes in daily life, n = 350 | ||||||
Yes | 9.1 | 22.7 | 1.9 | 39.6 | 26.6 | < .001 |
No | 1.5 | 6.6 | 2.0 | 34.2 | 55.6 | |
Sum variable: enough information, n = 343 | ||||||
For 4–5 issues | 8.8 | 26.5 | 2.0 | 38.8 | 23.8 | < .001 |
For 0–3 issues | 1.5 | 4.6 | 2.0 | 35.7 | 56.1 | |
So concerned about the wellbeing of the close one that their own wellbeing had deteriorated during the visiting ban, n = 364 | ||||||
Yes | 1.2 | 2.4 | 0.6 | 26.5 | 69.4 | < .001 |
No | 8.8 | 23.7 | 3.1 | 47.4 | 17.0 | |
Visiting restrictions are the right solution, n = 360 | ||||||
Agree | 8.1 | 20.7 | 1.5 | 47.0 | 22.7 | < .001 |
Do not agree | 1.9 | 5.6 | 2.5 | 24.7 | 65.4 |