Skip to main content

Table 2 Results obtained in the survey (session 1) employed to assess students’ opinion

From: Face-to-face and online teaching experience on experimental animals and alternative methods with nursing students: a research study

Statement

2019–20

2020–21

p-value

Median score (IQR)

Median score (IQR)

1. I have found the class interesting

5 (1)

4 (1)

0.000 a

2. My motivation for learning about the use of experimental animals in the study and development of drugs has increased

4 (1)

3 (1)

0.013 a

3. It has been a useful tool for learning Pharmacology

4 (1)

4 (1)

0.778

4. It has increased my knowledge about the use of experimental animals in the study and development of drugs

4 (1)

4 (1)

0.909

5. It has helped me to know how to value the use of experimental animals in Pharmacology

4 (1)

4 (1)

0.952

6. It has been useful for me to know the legislation on experimental animals

4 (1)

4 (1)

0.077

7. It has helped me to understand the concept and the importance of the practical application of the three Rs (Replacement, Reduction and Refinement)

4 (1)

4 (1)

0.023 a

8. I consider important the research in alternative techniques for learning Pharmacology

5 (1)

4 (1)

0.021 a

9. I consider interesting the interdisciplinary collaboration in the teaching of Pharmacology

4 (1)

4 (1)

0.782

10. I would have liked to be able to do the practice with mice, instead of watching a video

5 (1)

 

11. As a nursing student I do not need to know the use of experimental animals in Pharmacology

2 (1)

 

12. If I could legislate, I would ban the use of experimental animals in the research of new drugs

2 (1)

 
  1. Median score of a range from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). IQR: Interquartile range
  2. a Significant differences between both academic years (Chi-square test; p ≤ 0.05)