Skip to main content
Download PDF

Clinical narrative competence and humanistic care ability of nurses in assisted reproductive technology: a cross-sectional study

BMC Nursing volume 23, Article number: 119 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Growing focus on patient-centred care emphasizes humanistic skills and clinical narrative competence in nursing, particularly in assisted reproductive nursing. However, there is limited evidence to suggest the levels of nurse’ clinical narrative competence and humanistic care ability. This study aimed to investigate the clinical narrative competence and humanistic care ability of nurse specialists in assisted reproductive technology (ART) in China.

Methods

This cross-sectional study included nurses who obtained the ART specialist nurse certificate after nurse training in Zhejiang province assisted reproductive technology specialist nurse training base between 2017 and 2022. A demographic questionnaire, the Caring Ability Inventory (CAI) and Narrative Competence Scale (NCS) were used for data collection. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to explore risk factors.

Results

A total of 122 participants (120 females, with a mean age of 33.35 ± 5.00 years) were included (response rate = 82.43%). NCS score and CAI score was 143.39 ± 19.24 (range: 27–189) and 198.42 ± 19.51 (range: 37–259) among nurse specialists in assisted reproductive technology, respectively. Multivariate linear regression analysis indicated that professional title (β = 20.003, 95%CI: 3.271–36.735, P = 0.020), and the CAI (β = 0.342, 95%CI: 0.180–0.540, P < 0.001) was independently associated with NCS. Head Nurse/ Team Leader/ Clinical Faculty had significantly higher CAI score than nurse (P = 0.006).

Conclusions

The clinical narrative competence and caring ability of nurse specialists in assisted reproductive technology was considered sufficient. Professional titles and work position were associated with clinical narrative competence. Enhancing clinical narrative competence can be considered as an effective strategy for promoting humanistic care ability.

Trial registration

Not applicable.

Peer Review reports

Background

Assisted reproductive technology (ART) refers to medical procedures used primarily to address infertility. These include in vitro fertilization (IVF), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), cryopreservation of gametes or embryos, and the use of fertility medication [1, 2]. Since ART was first successfully applied in 1978, it has advanced remarkably and is widely-used in clinics for the treatment of infertility [3]. As of December 2022, a total of 559 reproductive medical centres have approved ART in China, and carried more than 1,000,000 reproductive treatment cycles yearly. The rapid development of ART has placed greater professional requirements on assisted reproductive nurses (ARN) [4]. ARN are pivotal in ART, influencing patient outcomes and well-being through expert care and emotional support, crucial for successful treatment and holistic patient health [5, 6].

While ART can address many reproductive issues, it cannot guarantee pregnancy for all women and carries risks like birth defects, low birth weight, and preterm deliveries [7, 8]. Infertile couples bear the burden of medical interventions related to the diagnosis and treatment of ART. Couples may need to tolerate high stress levels, and they need to manage their behavioral, mental and emotional responses to infertility and ART procedure [9]. Also of concerns is the strong need for emotional, psychosocial and informational support in infertile couples, while focusing on technology development. This place high demands on the level of nurses’ humanistic abilities [10], focusing on the holistic well-being of patients undergoing ART. Providing humanistic care and psychological support, along with enhancing clinical narrative competence, becomes essential in ensuring comprehensive patient care in this sensitive medical field [9, 10]. Since the late twentieth century, medical humanities have been recognized as a crucial aspect of medical education [11]. This rise coincides with the increasing emphasis on patient-centred care and the value of humanistic qualities in nursing for practicing medical humanities. Bridging this is narrative medicine, a patient-centred approach enhancing humanistic engagement through narrative, serving as an effective tool for medical humanities [12,13,14]. However, the success of narrative medicine hinges on the clinical narrative competence of medical professionals, especially nurse specialists who are integral to nursing practice. Over the past two decades, narrative medicine programs have become widespread globally [15]. China has seen a surge in research on narrative medicine, with colleges increasingly incorporating narrative competency training into medical education [16,17,18,19,20,21]. The educational reform aimed to transition from lecture-based to practice-oriented teaching, yet the direct implementation of narrative medicine in clinical healthcare is still limited.

Although humanistic care has been emphasised and extensive efforts have been made in nursing education, the integration of humanistic care into clinical practice remains optimistic, especially in China [22]. Previous studies have reported that Chinese nursing students tend to possess a relatively high level of caring knowledge. However, they tend to lack certain abilities [23, 24]. To the best of our knowledge, the clinical narrative competence and humanistic care ability of nurses in ART has not been reported. More information about the nurses’ clinical narrative competence and humanistic care ability is needed to understand and improve training and caring strategies. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the clinical narrative competence and humanistic care ability of nurse specialists in assisted reproductive technology in China.

Methods

Study design

A quantitative design based on a cross-sectional study was used.

Participants

Nurses who obtained the ART specialist nurse certificates after undergoing training in Zhejiang province assisted reproductive technology specialist nurse training base between 2017 and 2022, were recruited for this study. The study adhered to strict inclusion criteria, selecting only nurses who completed this specific training. The exclusion criterion was a refusal to take part in the study or currently not practicing in the field of ART nursing.

Ethics consideration

Ethical approval for this study was granted by the Institutional Review Board of Women’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University (Approval No. IRB-20220206-R). Written informed consents were obtained from all participants.

Data collection tool

Nurse specialists in ART were asked bout demographic questionnaire, CAI and NCS.

Demographic questionnaire

The demographic questionnaire collected participants’ information, including age, years of work experience, professional title, position, education level, gender, and the grade of their medical institution.

Caring ability inventory (CAI)

The Caring Ability Inventory (CAI), originally developed by Nkongho [25], was utilized to assess humanistic caring abilities. This tool, comprising 37 items across three dimensions (cognition, courage, patience), employs a 7-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating stronger caring abilities. The CAI, translated into various languages, had a Cronbach’s α coefficient of 0.849 in this study [26].

Narrative competence scale (NCS)

The Narrative Competence Scale (NCS), created by Ma [27], evaluated medical staff’s narrative competence. It features 27 items in three dimensions (listening, understanding/responding, reflecting) and uses a 7-point Likert scale. Higher scores on this scale reflect greater narrative competence. The NCS showed a Cronbach’s α coefficient of 0.958 in this study, underscoring its reliability.

Distribution and quality control

Nurses who completed ART specialist training in Zhejiang province were selected for this study. Participants first received and agreed to an electronic informed consent form before accessing the survey. The questionnaire, distributed via Questionnaire Star (https://www.wjx.cn/), was accessible through a web link, ensuring voluntary and anonymous participation. A dedicated team of two trained nurse research assistants oversaw the questionnaire’s promotion and distribution, rigorously checking responses for completeness and consistency. Responses with logical discrepancies, incomplete answers, or uniformity across items were deemed invalid.

Method of data analysis

Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests assessing the normality of continuous variables. Continuous variables are represented as means ± standard deviation (SD), and categorical variables as frequencies and percentages. T-tests and ANOVA determined differences in CAI and NCS scores based on participant characteristics. Pearson’s correlation coefficient evaluated the CAI-NCS relationship. R software version 4.2.3 facilitated multivariate linear regression analysis, significant variables in the univariate analysis (P < 0.05) were included in the multivariate linear regression analysis. Two-sided P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Demographic characteristics

A total of 148 assisted reproductive nurses from 23 provinces or cities and 71 medical institutions, having completed assisted reproductive technology training were recruited, 26 participants were excluded due to incomplete questionnaires and 122 participants returned complete questionnaires (response rate = 82.43%). There were 120 (98.36%) females and with a mean age of 33.35 ± 5.00 years. Majority of participants were working in medical institutions with Grade III level A (84.43%), graduated with a undergraduate education level (90.98%). Working years ranged from 3 to 28 years, with a mean of 11.42 ± 5.42 years. More than half of the participants had a middle professional title (55.74%). 22.95% participants had a work position as head nurse, team leader, clinical faculty.

Univariate analysis

The NCS score was 143.39 ± 19.24 ( range: 27–189) among nurse specialists in ART. Univariate analysis showed that the NCS score was significantly correlated with professional title (P < 0.01) and work position (P < 0.001). No statistical difference in the NCS was found among the different grades of medical institutions, working years, or education levels (P > 0.05) (Table 1). The CAI score was 198.42 ± 19.51 (range: 37–259) among nurse specialists in ART. Head Nurse/ Team Leader/ Clinical Faculty had significantly higher CAI score than nurse (P = 0.006) (Table 1).

Table 1 Clinical NCS and CAI among nurse specialist in ART (N = 122)
Full size table

Correlation analysis

The NCS was positively correlated with the CAI in terms of both total scores (r = 0.417, P < 0.01), and cognitive dimensions (r = 0.366, P < 0.01), courage dimensions (r = 0.239, P < 0.01), and patience dimensions (r = 0.251, P < 0.01), based on Pearson’s correlation (Table 2).

Table 2 Correlation analysis between NCS and CAI among nurse specialist in ART (N = 122)
Full size table

Multivariate linear analysis

Multivariate linear regression analysis suggested that professional title (β = 20.003, 95%CI: 3.271–36.735, P = 0.020), and the CAI (β = 0.342, 95%CI: 0.180–0.540, P < 0.001) was independently associated with NCS (Table 3).

Table 3 Mulvariate linear regression analysis of clinical narrative competence among nurse specialist in ART
Full size table

Discussion

This study found that the clinical narrative competence and caring ability of nurse specialists in assisted reproductive technology was considered sufficient. The NCS was positively correlated with the CAI. Professional titles and work position were associated with clinical narrative competence. Head Nurse/ Team Leader/ Clinical Faculty had significantly higher CAI score than nurse. This study may provide a foundation for future studies and interventions aimed at enhancing the skills and competencies of nurse specialists.

To adapt to the rapid growth of reproductive medicine, Zhejiang Province established its first training base for ART-specialised nurses in China in 2017. Between 2017 and 2022, a total of 148 trainees from 23 provinces or cities and 71 medical institutions obtained certification as specialised nurses after completing theoretical training, clinical practice training, assessment, and qualification certification. In addition to being senior practitioners of clinical nursing, ART nurse specialists not only undertake the whole process of nursing, technical implementation [28], and surgical cooperation for patients receiving ART treatment [29, 30], but are also responsible for providing instructions, patient education, therapeutic emotional support, explaining test results, decision-making consultation, follow-up, and other work [31, 32]. Due to the obvious negative emotions of infertile couples, such as anxiety, depression, isolation, and family and social tension [33,34,35], this ability is of great importance for nurse specialists in ART in terms of providing understanding, empathy, comfort, and counselling to patients. It has been shown that in the treatment of infertile couples, emotional, psychological and informational support can significantly alleviate patients’ adverse emotions, thereby improving the outcome of ART treatment [36, 37]. However, no research has focused on reporting the clinical narrative competence or humanistic care abilities of nurse specialists.

In this study, the NCS score was 143.39 ± 19.24 among nurse specialist in ART, which was lower than the 153.97 ± 15.15 among nurses from 14 general hospitals in the Jiangsu Province [38]. The above results are consistent with those of Zheng et al., possibly due to the fact that the nurses in this study were from different medical institutions in multivariate provinces and cities, with attention to narrative medicine varying greatly [39]. As a novel subject, narrative medicine has established its essential position in clinical medicine, and some colleges and universities, such as Peking Union Medical College and Southern Medical University, offer public elective courses in narrative medicine [40]. However, narrative medical education has not been included in the standardised training of nursing staff or nurse specialists; thus, the awareness of narrative medicine in clinical settings remains low.

Nursing practice in ART makes a significant contribution to patient care. The specialised role of the nurse practicing in the ART arena is continually evolving and expanding. Despite this, nurse specialists in ART have not been established in developed countries, such as the United States [41], Canada [42], the United Kingdom [43] and Japan [44]. The education, contextual knowledge and skills integral to this area of practice have not been clearly articulated, and there are significant differences and flexibility in the role functions undertaken by nurses in reproductive centres. However, reproductive medical staffs nowadays put more attention on technical, which favors healing over caring. The evaluation of nursing quality and professional development are largely dependent on the ability of ART nurses to articulate their practice, such as experience, knowledge, and procedural skill level, rather than humanistic practice or patient-centred functions. Our study provides valuable insights, the level of clinical narrative competence and caring ability of domestic nurse specialists in ART were sufficient, and this provides a foundation for advanced humanistic practice and narrative implementation in the near future.

This study found a significant association between clinical narrative competence and the CAI, which is consistent with the findings of Cui et al. [48]. The humanistic care ability of nursing staff is not innate, and its professional characteristics, such as caring emotions, social responsibility, humanitarian thought, values, and knowledge, need to be trained and strengthened by in-service education and clinical practice. Clinical humanistic care training programs mostly cover concept introduction, listening and communication skills, case analysis, simulation drilling, nursing etiquette, and other content [49, 50]. Its connotations are particularly consistent with the core elements of empathy and reflection in clinical narrative competence, which can effectively enhance the humanistic literacy and perception abilities of nursing staff. The results suggest that clinical narrative training in improving humanistic care ability should be explored and popularised in the nurse specialist training system.

The multivariate linear regression analysis indicated that nurse specialists with higher professional titles had higher NCS scores. The possible reasons for this might be that they had richer clinical work experience and stronger comprehensive quality ability while undertaking nursing work, to a greater extent, among patients with critical illness or difficulty communicating. In addition, they might have better abilities in communication, emotional management, observation, and coping 11, and could therefore pay more attention to the ideas and demands of patients, thus providing humanistic care. The results of this study have important implications for nursing education providers and nurse managers. The implication for nurse educators is enhancing clinical narrative training can be considered as an effective strategy for promoting humanistic care ability. For managers, it is important to understand the different characteristics of nurse specialists in ART to support humanistic caring transition from ability to practice, and thus ultimately facilitate improvement in quality of ART care.

This study had several limitations. First, it used self-reported data from an online application. This method is prone to potential recall or social desirability bias, which may lead to underreporting or overreporting of the outcomes. Second, the data were collected from participants selected through convenience sampling at a single training base of nurse specialists in ART; although the participants came from 71 representative medical institutions, the sample size was not particularly large, and it was not a multi-centre study. Therefore, the generalisability of the findings may be limited. Future large-scale national studies are required to confirm these findings.

Conclusions

The clinical narrative competence and caring ability of nurse specialists in assisted reproductive technology was considered sufficient. Professional titles and work position were associated with clinical narrative competence. Enhancing clinical narrative competence can be considered as an effective strategy for promoting humanistic care ability and the promotion of a supportive training approach is important for senior staff and nurses.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

CAI:

Caring Ability Inventory

NCS:

Narrative Competence Scale

ART:

Assisted reproductive technology

IVF:

In vitro fertilization

ICSI:

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection

ARN:

Assisted reproductive nurses

References

  1. Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1520-4.

  2. Van Voorhis BJ. Clinical practice. In vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:379–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Noah L. Trends in assisted reproductive technology. N Engl J Med. 2004;351.

  4. Barber GD, Denton J. Educating nurses–the assisted conception nursing care course of the RCN Institute. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:180–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Li W, Honggui W, Hong P, Hong L. Factors that affect career success of nurses who practice in assisted reproductive technology. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2023;31:e3926.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Spencer C. Assisted reproductive technology: a dilemma for the nursing profession. Contemp Nurse. 1995;4:174–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hansen M, Bower C, Milne E, de Klerk N, Kurinczuk JJ. Assisted reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects–a systematic review. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:328–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kurinczuk JJ, Hansen M, Bower C. The risk of birth defects in children born after assisted reproductive technologies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2004;16:201–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hamzehgardeshi Z, Kalantari F, Bakouei F, Moradi S, Peyvandi S, Shahidi M, et al. Investigation of social capital and its relationship with emotional adjustment in infertile couples: a cross-sectional study. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2022;20:91–100.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ebrahimzadeh ZS, Latifnejad RR, Janghorban R, Mousavi Bazaz SM, Amirian M, Allan HT. Infertile couples’ needs after unsuccessful fertility treatment: a qualitative study. J Caring Sci. 2019;8:95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Delvigne A, Vandromme J. Assessment of environmental knowledge and needs among assisted reproductive technology professionals. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;37:2347–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kissin DM, Jamieson DJ, Barfield WD. Monitoring health outcomes of assisted reproductive technology. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:91–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Chiou R-J, Tsai P-F, Han D-Y. Effects of a silent mentor initiation ceremony and dissection on medical students’ humanity and learning. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10:483.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Fenstermacher E, Longley RM, Amonoo HL. Finding the story in Medicine: the Use of Narrative techniques in Psychiatry. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2021;44:263–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liao H-C, Wang Y-h. Storytelling in Medical Education: Narrative Medicine as a resource for interdisciplinary collaboration. Int J Environ Res Public Health [Internet]. 2020; 17(4).

  16. Charon R. The patient-physician relationship. Narrative medicine: a model for empathy, reflection, profession, and trust. JAMA. 2001;286:1897–902.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Milota MM, van Thiel GJMW, van Delden JJM. Narrative medicine as a medical education tool: a systematic review. Med Teach. 2019;41:802–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yuan J, Zeng X, Cheng Y, Lan H, Cao K, Xiao S. Narrative medicine in clinical internship teaching practice. Med Educ Online. 2023;28:2258000.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Zonglan J, Pingping C, Yan W, Qiaolan Y, Shaohua H. The influence of narrative medicine teaching on the professional self-concept and professional values of nursing students. Chin J Med Educ. 2019;39:425.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Huang R. Narrative Medicine in China: how doctors write to understand the profession. Career Construction Theory and Life Writing: Routledge; 2021. pp. 102–15.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Huang C-D, Liao K-C, Chung F-T, Tseng H-M, Fang J-T, Lii S-C, et al. Different perceptions of narrative medicine between western and Chinese medicine students. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang N, Xiao H, Cao Y, Li S, Yan H, Wang Y. Does narrative medicine education improve nursing students’ empathic abilities and academic achievement? A randomised controlled trial. J Int Med Res. 2018;46:3306–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Guo L. An overview of Narrative Medicine in China. Chin Med Cult. 2023:101097.

  24. Wang Y, Zhang X, Xie Q, Zhou H, Cheng L. Humanistic caring ability of midwifery students in China and its associated factors: a multi-centre cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ Today. 2022;111:105276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Guo Y-j, Yang L, Ji H-x, Zhao Q. Caring characters and professional identity among graduate nursing students in China-A cross sectional study. Nurse Educ Today. 2018;65:150–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang Y, Zhang Y, Liu M, Zhou L, Zhang J, Tao H, et al. Research on the formation of humanistic care ability in nursing students: a structural equation approach. Nurse Educ Today. 2020;86:104315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. N. N. Measurement of nursing outcomes the caring ability inventory. Springer Publishing Co. 1991:3–16.

  28. Hayne ANSS, McDaniel GS. Faculty ability to care and caring characteristics in school of nursing climate: a national survey. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2019;40:E9–E15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ma Wanzhen GP. Zhang Jingjing, etc. Development and reliability and validity test of medical narrative ability scale for medical staff [ J ]. Chin J Nurs. 2020;55.

  30. Applegarth J, Dwyer T, Moxham L, Happell B. Identifying and acquiring the contextual skills and knowledge for nursing practice in assisted reproductive technology: a grounded theory study. J Clin Nurs. 2013;22:1738–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Morris EJ. The role of infertility nurses in ovulation induction programmes. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2001;4:14–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sinclair L, Morgan C, Lashen H, Afnan M, Sharif K. Nurses performing embryo transfer: the development and results of the Birmingham experience. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:699–702.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Breidahl V. The ART of fertility nursing in Australia. Aust Nurs J. 2005;13:27–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mitchell AM, Wagner C, Mittelstaedt ME. Assisted reproductive nursing: an emerging specialty. Fertil Steril. 2003;80.

  35. Crespo E, Bestard J. Psychosocial needs of women and their partners after successful assisted reproduction treatment in Barcelona. Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2016;3:90–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gabr AA, Omran EF, Abdallah AA, Kotb MM, Farid EZ, Dieb AS, et al. Prevalence of sexual dysfunction in infertile versus fertile couples. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;217:38–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Onat G, Kizilkaya Beji N. Effects of infertility on gender differences in marital relationship and quality of life: a case-control study of Turkish couples. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;165:243–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Li Y, Zhang X, Shi M, Guo S, Wang L. Resilience acts as a moderator in the relationship between infertility-related stress and fertility quality of life among women with infertility: a cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019;17:38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Rahimi R, Hasanpour S, Mirghafourvand M, Esmaeilpour K. Effect of Hope-oriented group counseling on mental health of infertile women with failed IVF cycles: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2021;21:286.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Ma WZ, Gu P, Zhang JJ. Development of the narrative competence scale and its test of reliability and validity. Chin J Nurs. 2020;55:578–83.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zheng QM, Pu HP, Yu HW. Prevalence of medical narrative ability among nurses in tertiary hospitals: a cross-sectional study. J Nurs Train. 2021;36:284–7.

    Google Scholar 

  42. F. L. Exploration of the teaching experiences on narrative medicine at Peking union Medical University. Med Philos. 2019;40:51–3.

  43. Sonya Flanders M. Challenges in clinical nurse specialist education and practice. Online J Issues Nurs. 2014;19:32.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Harbman P, Kaasalainen S, Carter N, Kilpatrick K. Education of advanced practice nurses in Canada. Nurs Leadersh. 2010:61.

  45. Peddie VL, Denton J, Barnett V. Toward developing a training pathway for fertility nurses: report of the 2010 training and educational survey. Hum Fertility. 2011;14:167–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kondo A. Advanced practice nurses in Japan: education and related issues. J Nurs Care S. 2013;5:2167–1168.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Cui JR, Hu LH, Kuang W, Xiao H, Zhang HY. JY. L. Relationship between humanistic care quality and narrative competence among clinical nurses. J Nurs Sci. 2021;36:58–60.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Rui C, Yilan L, Juan X. Study on curriculum setting of humanistic care training for nursing administrators in hospitals. Chin Nurs Res. 2016;30.

  49. He YL, Zhang SL. The design and application of humanistic care training program for new nurses. Chin J Nurs Educ. 2018;15:611–3.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Tian L, Li MY, Xiao SQ, Li HZ. Medical narrative ability and its influencing factors among nurses working in 3A hospitals. J Nurs Sci. 2021;36:72–5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank all nurse specialists in ART who participated in the study, and all members of our study team.

Funding

This study was supported by the Medical Science and Technology Project of the Zhejiang Province [2022KY184].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Women’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China

    Fengyi Mo, Xiaorui Hu, Qing Ma & Lanfeng Xing

Authors
  1. Fengyi Mo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaorui Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qing Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lanfeng Xing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

FYM: Conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analysed and interpreted the data, and wrote the manuscript. XRH: Analysed and interpreted the data. QM: Performed the experiments; Analysed and interpreted the data. LFX: Conceived and designed the experiments; revised the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lanfeng Xing.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was carried out after the protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Women’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University (No.IRB-20220206-R). I confirm that all methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines. All procedures were performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments, and informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mo, F., Hu, X., Ma, Q. et al. Clinical narrative competence and humanistic care ability of nurses in assisted reproductive technology: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs 23, 119 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-01791-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-01791-6

Keywords

BMC Nursing

ISSN: 1472-6955

Contact us