Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26 Feb 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 6 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nina Rottmann |
| 5 Jul 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - arlene houldin |
| 2 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Gerd Ahlstrom |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 2 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 9 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - arlene houldin |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| 24 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nina Rottmann |
| 29 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Gerd Ahlstrom |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 29 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 18 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Nina Rottmann |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| 27 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Gerd Ahlstrom |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 27 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
| 1 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Gerd Ahlstrom |
| Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
| 1 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
| Publishing | ||
| 4 Oct 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
| 4 Oct 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6955-10-18 |
You can find further information about peer review here.