Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
9 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
9 Dec 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Hilde Valen Waehle |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
9 Dec 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
27 Feb 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Brigid Gillespie |
9 May 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tanja Manser |
10 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Hilde Valen Waehle |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
10 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
10 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Hilde Valen Waehle |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
10 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
10 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Hilde Valen Waehle |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
10 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
24 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Tanja Manser |
27 Jul 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Brigid Gillespie |
28 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Hilde Valen Waehle |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
28 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
31 Aug 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
7 Sep 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6955-11-16 |
You can find further information about peer review here.