Peer Review reports
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 13 Jul 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Karen Benzies |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 13 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 2 Aug 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Karen Benzies |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 2 Aug 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 28 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Megan Bair-Merritt |
| 13 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Douglas Wiebe |
| 24 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Karen Benzies |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 24 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 28 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Megan Bair-Merritt |
| 9 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Douglas Wiebe |
| 5 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Karen Benzies |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 5 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 11 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Douglas Wiebe |
| 24 Jan 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Megan Bair-Merritt |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 7 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 20 Feb 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 20 Feb 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6955-11-2 |
You can find further information about peer review here.