Skip to main content

Table 4 Convergent validity: Item of RADAR vs. corresponding CAM item

From: Recognizing acute delirium as part of your routine [RADAR]: a validation study

RADAR items

CAM

Number of CAM assessments on which the CAM item is rated

% of agreement

Kappa [95% CI]

Item #1, “…was the patient drowsy?”

CAM 4, Level of consciousness, Hypoalert

1

83.9 (162/193)

0.36 [0.19-0.53]

2

76.7 (148/193)

0.25 [0.11-0.39]

3

65.8 (127/193)

0.15 [0.05-0.26]

Item #2, “…trouble following your instructions?”

CAM 2, Inattention

1

51.8 (100/193)

0.08 [0.03-0.12]

2

43.5 (84/193)

0.08 [0.03-0.12]

3

35.8 (69/193)

0.08 [0.03-0.12]

Item #2, “…trouble following your instructions?”

CAM 4 and 8, Hyper-alert/Agitation

1

85 (164/193)

0.16 [−0.02-0.33]

2

85 (164/193)

0.16 [−0.02-0.33]

3

85 (164/193)

0.16 [−0.02-0.33]

Item #3, “…movements slowed down?”

CAM 9, Psychomotor retardation

1

76.6 (147/192)

0.40 [0.25-0.54]

2

76.0 (146/192)

0.43 [0.29-0.57]

3

75.0 (144/192)

0.42 [0.28-0.56]

  1. CAM: Confusion Assessment Method.