Skip to main content

Table 5 Regression analysis of factors predicting job preference of Thai nursing students

From: Factors associated with the choice of public health service among nursing students in Thailand

 

(Model 1)

(Model 2)

(Model 3)

(Model 4)

Intend to work in the public sector immediately after graduation

Intend to work in the public sector 5 years after graduation

Average score for “good income” as a reason for choosing a job

Composite index for attitude towards working in rural areas

OR (95% CI)

p-value

OR (95% CI)

p-value

Coeff (SE)

p value

Coeff (SE)

p value

MOPH (vs Private)

13.184 (10.454−16.628)

<0.001

3.393 (2.786−4.132)

<0.001

−0.258 (0.048)

<0.001

−0.105 (0.085)

0.217

MOE (vs Private)

6.015 (4.899−7.385)

<0.001

2.199 (1.823−2.654)

<0.001

−0.159 (0.047)

0.001

−0.083 (0.084)

0.324

Local recruitment (vs National entrance)

0.996 (0.831−1.194)

0.968

1.083 (0.925−1.268)

0.322

−0.059 (0.038)

0.124

0.188 (0.068)

0.005

Rural domicile during childhood (vs Not)

1.218 (1.025−1.448)

0.025

1.317 (1.134−1.530)

<0.001

−0.123 (0.036)

0.001

0.171 (0.064)

0.008

Female (vs Male)

2.056 (1.422−2.972)

<0.001

1.818 (1.311−2.522)

<0.001

−0.132 (0.082)

0.109

0.465 (0.145)

0.001

Aged over 25y old (vs < 25y)

1.398 (0.818−1.391)

0.221

0.873 (0.528−1.443)

0.597

−0.211 (0.127)

0.099

−0.293 (0.224)

0.191

Motivated by money ranking score

0.723 (0.666−0.745)

<0.001

0.933 (0.868−1.002)

0.057

  

−0.134 (0.031)

<0.001

Had financial burden (vs Not)

0.823 (0.681−0.995)

0.044

1.010 (0.856−1.192)

0.907

−0.062 (0.040)

0.126

0.087 (0.071)

0.222

Constant

 Observations

3150

 

3156

 

3219

 

3183

 

 Pseudo R-squared

0.190

 

0.048

 

0.015

 

0.018

 

p-value

<0.001

 

<0.001

 

<0.001

 

<0.001