Skip to main content

Table 1 Study and intervention characteristics

From: Effectiveness, structure, and content of nurse counseling in gynecologic oncology: a systematic review

Reference & country

Study design

Participants

Interventions

Structure components

Content components

Outcome measures

Variables – Measures

Time points

Results

Study qualitya

Evidence levelb

AktaÅŸ et al. 2014 [41]

Turkey

RCT

Repeated measures

Experimental

Patients with gynecological cancer

N = 70

Intervention – Home Care Service: n = 35

Attention control: n = 35

Age: M = 49

43% ovarian, 43% endometrial, 14% cervical cancer

Provider/receiver

Nurse (not specified)/patients

Disease

Psychosocial symptoms

Sexual satisfaction – Golombok Rust Inventory of Sexual Satisfaction (GRISS)

T1: pre-surgery

T2: 12 weeks post-surgery

• Significant improvement in intervention group at T2 in overall sexual satisfaction (p = .001) and in its subscales ‘sexual non-communication’, ‘anorgasmia’, ‘avoidance’, ‘vaginismus’, ‘dissatisfaction’, and ‘non-sensuality’ (all p < .05)

• No significant improvement in the ‘infrequency of sexual contact’ subscale (p = .77)

Low

1c

Time frame

Repeated consultations before, during, and after active treatment

Treatment

Psychosocial symptoms

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Symptom Management

Symptom etiology; symptom prevention; symptom treatment

Format & setting

Individual counseling; clinic & home

Materials

Symptom-management guideline; individual care plans

Resources

Social network

Concepts

Structured & tailored counseling

Chow et al. 2014 [42]

China

RCT

Mixed methods

Feasibility study

Repeated measures

Experimental

Patients newly diagnosed with gynecological cancer scheduled for surgery

N = 26

Intervention – psychoeducational program: n = 13

Attention control: n = 13

Age: M = 51

31% cervical, 54% uterine, 15% ovarian cancer

Provider/receiver

Non-APN with academic education/patients

Disease

Etiology; physical and psychosocial symptoms

Quality of life – Traditional Chinese Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General

Sexual functioning – Sexual functioning-Vaginal changes Questionnaire

Uncertainty – Mishel’s Uncertainty in Illness Scale

Anxiety/depression – Hospital Anxiety & Depression Scale

Social support – Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey

T1: pre-surgery

T3: 8 weeks post-surgery

T3: 8 weeks post-surgery

T1: pre-surgery

T2: post-surgery

T3: 8 weeks post-surgery

• No significant group differences in overall quality of life and its ‘physical’, ‘functional’, ‘emotional’ and ‘social’ subscales, in sexual functioning, in overall uncertainty and its ‘ambiguity’, ‘complexity’, and ‘unpredictability’ subscales, in anxiety and depression, and in social support (all p > .05)

• Significant improvement at T2 in intervention group in the uncertainty subscale ‘inconsistency’ (p = .026)

Moderate

1c

Time frame

Repeated, long consultations before, during, and after active treatment

Treatment

Therapeutic procedures; physical and psychosocial symptoms

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face & phone

Symptom Management

Symptom prevention; symptom treatment

Format & setting

Individual & group counseling; clinic

Materials

no materials

Resources

Personal capabilities; social network; healthcare services

Concepts

Structured & tailored; theoretical basis

Cox et al. 2008 [46]

United Kingdom

One-group pretest-posttest

Case series

Pre-experimental

Patients with ovarian cancer having completed chemotherapy

Telephone follow-up on chemotherapy symptom management: N = 56

Age: M = 62

Provider/receiver

APN with academic education/patients

Disease

Etiology; diagnostic procedures

Quality of life – FACT Ovarian (FACT O)

Patient experience and satisfaction –self-designed patient experience and satisfaction questionnaire

T1: after chemotherapy completion

T2: 10 months from baseline

• No significant improvement in overall quality of life and its ‘physical’, ‘functional’, ‘social’, and ‘symptoms’ subscales (all p > .05)

• Significant improvement in the ‘emotional’ quality of life subscale (p = .016)

• Patient satisfaction and experience high (M = 8.24, SD = 2.0) at T2 (no pretest scores provided)

Low

4c

Time frame

Repeated, short consultations after active treatment

Treatment

Physical and psychosocial symptoms

Mode of delivery

Phone

Symptom Management

Symptom etiology; symptom treatment

Format & setting

Individual counseling

Materials

Symptom-assessment tool; symptom-management guideline; leaflets

Resources

Personal capabilities; social network; healthcare services

Concepts

Structured & tailored counseling; inter-disciplinary orientation

Donovan et al. 2014 [25]

USA

RCT

Waitlist-control

Pilot study

Repeated measures

Experimental

Patients with persistent or recurrent ovarian cancer

N = 65

Intervention – Web-based symptom management: n = 33

Control: n = 32

Age: M = 56

Provider/receiver

Non-APN with academic education/patients

Disease

Physical and psychosocial symptoms

Symptom outcomes – Symptom Representation Questionnaire (SQR)

T1: pre-intervention

T2: 2 weeks post-intervention

T3: 6 weeks post-intervention

• Significant improvement of symptom distress over time (p = .037) and of symptom severity at T1 in intervention group (p = .058)

• No significant group differences in symptom consequences or symptom controllability (all p > .05)

• Patients highly satisfied with intervention and web-based delivery (Mdn not provided)

High

1c

Time frame

Repeated consultations before, during, and after active treatment

Treatment

Physical and psychosocial symptoms

Mode of delivery

Internet

Symptom Management

Symptom etiology; symptom assessment; goal setting & planning; symptom prevention/treatment; evaluation & modification

Format & setting

Individual counseling

Satisfaction with intervention – self-designed questionnaire

T3: 6 weeks post-intervention

Materials

Symptom-assessment tool; symptom-management guidelines; individual care plans

Concepts

Structured & tailored; interdisciplinary orien-tation theoretical basis;

Resources

Personal capabilities; healthcare services

Liu et al. 2001 [48]

Taiwan

Posttest-only with nonequivalent comparison group

Observational-descriptive study

Repeated measures

Pre-experimental

Patients with cervical cancer who had radical hysterectomy

N = 20

Intervention I – Educational program for lower urinary tract self-care by a head nurse + written material: n = 11

Intervention II – Educational program for lower urinary tract self-care by a staff nurse: n = 9

Provider/receiver

Intervention I & II: non-APN without academic education/patients

Disease

Intervention I & II: no content

Knowledge about Foley care & bladder training – self-designed questionnaire

T1: at discharge

T2: at readmission 2 weeks later

• Significant improvement of knowledge in intervention I at T1 (p = .004), but not at T2 (p = .71)

• No significant group differences at T2 in performance at home, urinalysis, or urine culture (all p > .05)

Moderate

4b

Time frame

Intervention I & II: Repeated consultations during active treatment

Treatment

Intervention I & II: Physical symptoms

Mode of delivery

Intervention I & II: face-to-face

Symptom Management

Intervention I & II: symptom assessment; symptom prevention; symptom treatment; evaluation & modif

Home performance of Foley catheter self-care – self-designed questionnaire

Urinalysis, urine culture – laboratory records

T2: at readmission 2 weeks later

Format & setting

Intervention I & II: individual; clinic

Materials

Intervention I: leaflet

Intervention II: none

Concepts

Intervention I & II: structured counseling

Resources

Intervention I & II: no content

Maughan et al. 2001 [26]

United Kingdom

RCT

Mixed methods

Repeated measures

Experimental

Patients with gynecological cancer and major pelvic surgery

N = 36

Intervention – Clinical Nurse Specialist intervention: n = 19

Control: n = 17

Age: M = 50

Provider/receiver

APN with academic education/patients, families

Disease

Not specified

Quality of life – European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)

T1: pre-surgery

T2: 6 weeks post-surgery

T3: 12 weeks post-surgery

T4: 14 weeks post-surgery

T5: 24 weeks post-surgery

• Significant improvement in overall quality of life (p = .04) in the intervention group

• No significant group differences in the ‘physical’, ‘cognitive’, ‘emotional’, ‘social’, and ‘sexual’ quality of life subscales, as well as in sexual functioning (all p > .05)

Moderate

1c

Time frame

Repeated consultations before, during, and after active treatment

Treatment

Therapeutic procedures; psycho-social symptoms

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Symptom Management

Symptom etiology; symptom prevention; symptom treatment

Format & setting

Individual counseling; clinic & home

Materials

Leaflets

Resources

Personal capabilities; social network; healthcare services

Sexual functioning – Lasry Sexual Function Scale

T3: 12 weeks post-surgery

T5: 24 weeks post-surgery

Concepts

structured & tailored; interdisciplinary orientation

McCorkle et al. 2009 [43]

USA

RCT

Repeated measures

Experimental

Patients with ovarian cancer following surgery and scheduled for chemotherapy

N = 149

Intervention – Advanced Practice Nurse intervention + Psychiatric Consultation-Liaison Nurse (PCLN) for women with high distress: n = 74

Attention control: n = 75

Age: M = 60

Provider/receiver

APN with academic education/patients, families

Disease

Physical & psychosocial symptoms

Depression – Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D)

Uncertainty – Ambiguity subscale of the Mishel Uncertainty in Illness Scale (MUIS)

Symptom distress – Symptom Distress Scale (SDS)

Overall quality of life – Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12)

T1: 24-48 h post-surgery

T2: 1 month post-surgery

T3: 3 months post-surgery

T4: 6 months post-surgery

• Significant improvement of uncertainty concerning ambiguity (p = .018), symptom distress (p < .001), ‘physical’ and ‘cognitive’ quality of life subscales (all p < .001) over time in intervention group

• No significant group differences over time in overall quality of life and depression (all p > .05)

High

1c

Time frame

Repeated consultations during and after active treatment

Treatment

Decision-making; physical & psycho-social symptoms

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face & phone

Symptom Management

Symptom etiology; symptom assessment; goal setting & planning; symptom prevention, symptom treatment; evaluation & modification of strategies

Format & setting

Individual counseling; clinic & home

Materials

Symptom-assessment tool; symptom-management guideline; individual care plan

Concepts

Structured & tailored counseling; interdisciplinary orientation; theoretical basis

Resources

Social network; healthcare services

McCorkle et al. 2011 [44]

USA

Same study like McCorkle et al. 2009 [43]

N = 149

Intervention: n = 74

Attention control: n = 75

Age: M = 61

Same structure and content like in McCorkle et al. 2009 [43]

Healthcare utilization – self-designed patient questionnaire, review of medical records

T1: pre-surgery

T2: 6 weeks post-surgery

• Significant less primary care visits in intervention group (p < .001)

• No significant group differences in hospitalizations, oncology outpatient visits, and emergency room visits (all p > .05)

High

1c

Nolte et al. 2006 [45]

USA

RCT

Mixed methods

Repeated measures

Multicenter

Experimental

Patients with gynecologic cancer and chemotherapy-induced alopecia

N = 136

Intervention I – standard counseling: n = 68

Intervention II – standard counseling + videotape: n = 68

Age: M = 58

Ovarian, uterine, and cervical cancer

Provider/receiver

Intervention I & II: Nurse (not specified)/patients

Disease

Intervention I & II: no content

Body image & self-esteem – Body Cathexis/Self-Cathexis Scale (BCSCS)

T1: before chemotherapy cycle 1

T2: before chemotherapy cycle 3

T3: after chemotherapy cycle 4

• No significant group differences in body image and self-esteem (all p > .05)

Moderate

1c

Time frame

Intervention I & II: One-time consultation before active treatment

Treatment

Intervention I & II: physical symptoms

Mode of delivery

Intervention I & II: face-to-face

Symptom Management

Intervention I & II: symptom etiology; symptom treatment

Format & setting

Intervention I & II: individual counseling; clinic

Materials

Intervention I & II: Symptom-management guideline

Intervention II: video

Resources

Intervention I & II: healthcare services

Concepts

Intervention I & II: structured counseling; theoretical basis

  

So et al. 2006 [47]

China

One-group pretest-posttest

Case series –

Patients with cervical cancer receiving brachytherapy

Provider/receiver

Nurse (not specified)/patients, families

Disease

No content

Knowledge & attitudes regarding vaginal douching – self-designed

questionnaire

T1: presumably 1–2 weeks before

brachytherapy

T2: presumably 1–2 weeks before brachytherapy

T3: admission day brachytherapy

• Significant improvement of knowledge from pre-intervention to T2 and from pre-intervention to T3 (p < .001)

• Significant improvement of attitudes towards self-care from pre-intervention to T2 (p < .001), but not from pre-intervention to T3 (p > .05)

Moderate

4c

Treatment

Physical symptoms

 

repeated measures

Pre-experimental

Education program on vaginal douching: N = 30

Time frame

One-time, long consultation before active treatment

Symptom Management

Symptom etiology; symptom assessment, symptom prevention; symptom treatment

Mode of delivery

Face-to-face

Format & setting

Individual counseling (presumably); clinic

Concepts

Structured & tailored counseling

Resources

No content

  1. RCT randomized controlled trial, M mean, p p-value
  2. aLow methodological quality refers to total quality scores ranging from 0 to 49%; Moderate methodological quality refers to total quality scores ranging from 50 to 79%; high methodological quality refers to total quality scores ranging from 80 to 100%
  3. bLevel 1 refers to experimental designs, level 2 to quasi-experimental designs, level 3 to observational-analytic designs, level 4 to observational-descriptive studies, and level 5 to expert opinion and bench research [33]