Skip to main content

Table 4 Differences in nursing competence between groups

From: Nursing competence in municipal in-patient acute care in Norway: a cross-sectional study

 

Ratio of RNs in staff

Shifts with one RN on duty

Nightshifts with one RN on duty

Dayshifts with one RN on duty

Comparation between groups

r

Adj. p value

r

Adj. p value

r

Adj. p value

r

Adj. p value

Institutional locations

 Nursing homes- Others

0.31

< 0.001

0.22

0.028

0.19

0.102

 

na

 Nursing homes- HH/LMCs

0.39

<  0.001

0.37

< 0.001

0.29

0.001

 

na

 Nursing homes- OMS

0.43

<  0.001

0.33

< 0.001

0.31

< 0.001

 

na

 Others- HH/LMCs

0.09

1.0

0.19

1.0

0.13

1.00

 

na

 Others- OMS

0.26

1.0

0.22

1.0

0.24

1.00

 

na

 HH/LMCs- OMS

0.17

1.0

0.03

1.0

0.11

1.00

 

na

Organisation categories

 Short-term care units -Separate MipAC units

0.27

0.017

0.21

0.094

0.14

0.5

 

na

 Long-term care units -Short-term care unites

0.43

<  0.001

0.44

< 0.001

0.31

< 0.001

 

na

 Long-term care units -Separate MipAC units

0.56

<  0.001

0.52

< 0.001

0.37

< 0.001

 

na

Geographical region

 Central Norway-Southern-Eastern Norway

0.26

0.022

 

na

 

na

 

na

 Central Norway-Western Norway

0.34

0.020

 

na

 

na

 

na

 Northern Norway -Southern-Eastern Norway

0.26

0.017

 

na

 

na

 

na

 Northern Norway-Western Norway

0.31

0.019

 

na

 

na

 

na

 Central Norway-Northern Norway

0.02

1.000

 

na

 

na

 

na

 Southern-Eastern Norway-Western-Norway

0.06

1.000

 

na

 

na

 

na

 

r

p-value

r

p-value

r

p-value

r

p-value

Not intermunicipal MipAC- Intermunicipal MipAC

0.45

<  0.001

 

na

0.32

<  0.001

0.20

0.005

Less than two MipAC beds or more

0.51

<  0.001

0.34

< 0.001

 

na

0.28

< 0.001

  1. Not applicable = na, due to heterogeneity of variance as described in Field (2009). Comparing evening shifts between the group categories was not applicable. A large effect is proposed to be r ≥ 0.5, a medium effect r = 0.3–0.5, and a small effect r ≥ 0.1 (Fritz et al. 2012)