Skip to main content

Table 3 Difference in Quality of Nursing Educational Program according to Profile of Faculty

From: Quality of nursing education programme in the Philippines: faculty members perspectives

Profile of HEIs

Quality Matrix

F

p-value

Decision (Ho)

Interpretation

Clinical experience

Mission/Vision/Goals/Objectives

2.332

0.058

Accept

Not significant

Curriculum and instruction

0.862

0.488

Accept

Not significant

Administration of nursing programme

0.672

0.612

Accept

Not significant

Faculty development program

0.666

0.617

Accept

Not significant

Physical structure and equipment

0.705

0.589

Accept

Not significant

Student services

0.763

0.828

Accept

Not significant

Admission of students

0.302

0.876

Accept

Not significant

Quality assurance system

0.694

0.597

Accept

Not significant

Teaching experience

Mission/Vision/Goals/Objectives

3.600

0.008*

Reject

Significant

Curriculum and instruction

2.592

0.038*

Reject

Significant

Administration of nursing programme

2.856

0.025*

Reject

Significant

Faculty development program

4.162

0.003*

Reject

Significant

Physical structure and equipment

3.128

0.016*

Reject

Significant

Student services

3.104

0.017*

Reject

Significant

Admission of students

3.421

0.010*

Reject

Significant

Quality assurance system

3.471

0.009*

Reject

Significant

Job category

Mission/Vision/Goals/Objectives

1.046

0.376

Accept

Not significant

Curriculum and instruction

1.107

0.355

Accept

Not significant

Administration of nursing programme

1.734

0.145

Accept

Not significant

Faculty development program

1.171

0.325

Accept

Not significant

Physical structure and equipment

1.114

0.219

Accept

Not significant

Student services

1.891

0.114

Accept

Not significant

Admission of students

1.453

0.218

Accept

Not significant

Quality assurance system

0.538

0.708

Accept

Not significant

  1. The p-values denoted by ‘*’ are significant at a level of p < 0.05, Ho – denotes null hypothesis