Skip to main content

Table 3 Difference in Quality of Nursing Educational Program according to Profile of Faculty

From: Quality of nursing education programme in the Philippines: faculty members perspectives

Profile of HEIs Quality Matrix F p-value Decision (Ho) Interpretation
Clinical experience Mission/Vision/Goals/Objectives 2.332 0.058 Accept Not significant
Curriculum and instruction 0.862 0.488 Accept Not significant
Administration of nursing programme 0.672 0.612 Accept Not significant
Faculty development program 0.666 0.617 Accept Not significant
Physical structure and equipment 0.705 0.589 Accept Not significant
Student services 0.763 0.828 Accept Not significant
Admission of students 0.302 0.876 Accept Not significant
Quality assurance system 0.694 0.597 Accept Not significant
Teaching experience Mission/Vision/Goals/Objectives 3.600 0.008* Reject Significant
Curriculum and instruction 2.592 0.038* Reject Significant
Administration of nursing programme 2.856 0.025* Reject Significant
Faculty development program 4.162 0.003* Reject Significant
Physical structure and equipment 3.128 0.016* Reject Significant
Student services 3.104 0.017* Reject Significant
Admission of students 3.421 0.010* Reject Significant
Quality assurance system 3.471 0.009* Reject Significant
Job category Mission/Vision/Goals/Objectives 1.046 0.376 Accept Not significant
Curriculum and instruction 1.107 0.355 Accept Not significant
Administration of nursing programme 1.734 0.145 Accept Not significant
Faculty development program 1.171 0.325 Accept Not significant
Physical structure and equipment 1.114 0.219 Accept Not significant
Student services 1.891 0.114 Accept Not significant
Admission of students 1.453 0.218 Accept Not significant
Quality assurance system 0.538 0.708 Accept Not significant
  1. The p-values denoted by ‘*’ are significant at a level of p < 0.05, Ho – denotes null hypothesis