Skip to main content

Table 4 Associations between research factors and covariates of interest

From: Towards translational research participation for nurses and midwives: a mixed method study

Survey item

(Binary outcome)

Covariate

Odds ratio (95% CI)

p-value

Previous Involvement in Research

 

Employment Classification (RN/RM compared to CNC/ CMC)

7.6 (3.3, 19.1)

< 0.001

 

Speciality (Midwifery compared to Mental Health)

6.7 (1.9, 23.6)

< 0.01

 

Position location (Metropolitan compared to Rural)

0.4 (0.2, 0.8)

< 0.01

Factor

(Continuous outcome)

Covariate

Mean score (95% CI)

p-value

Perceived Translation of Research into Practice

 

Medical specialty compared to Midwifery

24.3 (23.3, 25.2)

0.02

 

Critical care compared to Midwifery

24.6 (23.4, 25.9)

0.02

 

Palliative care compared to Midwifery

24.6 (22.5, 26.7)

> 0.05

 

Perceived Value of Research

0.18 (0.03, 0.33)

< 0.02

 

Perceived Organizational Support

0.47 (0.31, 0.62)

< 0.01

 

Perceived Organizational Culture & Capability

0.01 (0.00, 0.02)

< 0.01

Perceived Individual Research Capacity

 

Highest qualification

PhD, Prof Doc, Research Masters

85.8 (74.9, 96.7)

< 0.01

  

Masters Course Work

72.7 (67.4, 78.0)

< 0.01

  

Certificate

56.3 (49.4, 63.2)

0.03

  

No research ≤5 yrs

2.53 (1.11, 3.94)

< 0.01

Perceived Organisational Culture and Capability

 

Metropolitan vs Rural/remote

0.55 vs 0.45

0.02

 

Perceived Translation of Research

1.35 (0.3, 2.40)

0.01

 

Perceived Organisational Support

7.95 (6.06, 9.84)

< 0.01

Perceived Organizational Support

   

Least square Mean score (95% CI)

p-value

 

Employment classification

CNC/CMC

9.5 (8.8, 10.2)

< 0.01

  

Nurse/Midwife Unit Manager

9.3 (8.3, 10.3)

0.05

  

Regression coefficient (95% CI)

p-value

 

Perceived Research Relevance

0.16 (0.09, 0.23)

< 0.01

 

Perceived Translation of Research

0.11 (0.07, 0.16)

< 0.01

 

Perceived Organizational. Culture & Capability

0.01 (0.01, 0.02)

< 0.01