Table 2 Comparison between two groups in terms of sociodemographic characteristics
From: Impact of dyadic practice on the clinical self-efficacy and empathy of nursing students
Groups Variables | Â | Control | Intervention Group | P-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Frequency (%)a | Frequency (%)a | |||
Age (year) | 18–23 | 15(0.75%) | 16(80.0%) | 0.465 |
24–29 | 15(25.0%) | 3(15.0%) |  | |
≤30 | 0(0.0%) | 1(5.00%) |  | |
Gender | Female | 13(65.0%) | 8(40.0%) | 0.205 |
Male | 7(35.0%) | 12(60.0%) | Â | |
Marital Status | Married | 3(15.0%) | 2(10.0%) | > 0.999 |
Single | 17(85.0%) | 18(90.0%) | Â | |
Residence Status | Non-Dormitory | 8(40.0%) | 10(50.0%) | 0.751 |
Dormitory | 12(60.0%) | 10(50.0%) | Â | |
Average Passed Courses | Below 15 | 9(45.0%) | 8(40.0%) | > 0.999 |
15 Or More | 11(55.0%) | 12(60.0%) | Â |