Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparisons of SECP and their Subscales Within- and Inter- group before and after the intervention

From: Effectiveness of the SBAR-Based training program in self-efficacy and clinical decision-making of undergraduate anesthesiology nursing students: a quasi-experimental study

Characteristics

Groups

Pre-test

Post-test

t

P

Mean ± SD

1. SECP

Cont.

83.94 ± 15.51

85.34 ± 18.15

0.391

0.698

Int.

85.97 ± 14.18

140.66 ± 22.43

12.326

< 0.001

  

t = 0.571, P = 0.570

t = 11.340, P < 0.001

  

1.1 Assessment

Cont.

25.97 ± 6.42

25.94 ± 6.78

-0.022

0.982

Int.

26.86 ± 9.46

42.51 ± 7.38

9.630

< 0.001

  

t = 0.458, P = 0.648

t = 9.786, P < 0.001

  

1.2 Diagnosis & Planning

Cont.

20.00 ± 4.85

19.11 ± 6.02

-0.782

0.439

Int.

21.49 ± 6.05

34.74 ± 7.02

9.416

< 0.001

 

t = 1.134, P = 0.261

t = 9.997, P < 0.001

  

1.3 Implementation

Cont.

24.37 ± 5.15

24.86 ± 5.61

0.422

0.676

Int.

24.03 ± 4.02

37.91 ± 6.46

12.106

< 0.001

  

t= -0.311, P = 0.757

t = 9.028, P < 0.001

  

1.4 Evaluation

Cont.

12.49 ± 3.31

12.66 ± 3.64

0.298

0.768

Int.

13.89 ± 3.98

23.14 ± 4.64

8.827

< 0.001

  

t = 1.601, P = 0.114

t = 10.520, P < 0.001

  
  1. Int. = intervention group; Cont. = control group
  2. *Independent–sample t test, Paired sample t test