Table 4 Methodological quality of studies using the COSMIN Risk of Bias Checklist
From: A systematic review of the measurement properties of self-care scales in nurses
Studies (Scales) | Structural validity | Internal consistency | Cross-cultural validity (Measurement invariant) | Reliability (Test-retest) | Criterion validity | Construct validity (Hypotheses testing) | Measurement error | Responsiveness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sabourian Jouybari et al. (SCBN) [15] | NR | Doubtful | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
Galiana et al. (PSC) [30] | Very good | Very good | NR | NR | NR | Adequate | NR | NR |
Kohli et al. (SCA) [31] | NR | Doubtful | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
Zeb et al. (MSC) [32] | NR | Very good | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |
Yang et al. (MSC) [33] | Very good | Very good | Inadequate | Inadequate | NR | NR | NR | NR |
Ahmadi et al. (SAQ) [14] | NR | Doubtful | Inadequate | NR | NR | NR | NR | NR |