Skip to main content

Table 4 Bootstrap analyses of magnitude and statistical significance of effects

From: The mediating role of coping styles in the relationship between second victim experience and professional quality of life among nurses: a cross-sectional study

Model pathways

Estimate

95% BCBCI

Lower 2.5%

Upper 2.5%

Standardized total effects

 SVRS → CS

-0.126

-0.208

-0.047

 SVRS → BO

0.374

0.277

0.472

 SVRS → STS

0.551

0.459

0.635

 RSVSU → CS

-0.623

-0.698

-0.539

 RSVSU → BO

-0.257

-0.360

-0.155

 RSVSU → STS

-0.002

-0.102

0.096

Standardized direct effects

 SVRS → CS

-0.101

-0.191

-0.022

 SVRS → BO

0.257

0.163

0.344

 SVRS → STS

0.39

0.304

0.465

 RSVSU → CS

-0.272

-0.405

-0.149

 RSVSU → BO

0.038

-0.103

0.164

 RSVSU → STS

0.155

0.033

0.289

Standardized indirect effects

 SVRS → PC → CS

-0.044

-0.084

-0.009

 SVRS → PC → BO

-0.031

-0.063

-0.005

 SVRS → PC → STS

-0.012

-0.036

-0.001

 RSVSU → PC → CS

-0.344

-0.438

-0.267

 RSVSU → PC → BO

-0.243

-0.340

-0.161

 RSVSU → PC → STS

-0.096

-0.188

-0.020

 SVRS → NC → CS

0.019

-0.005

0.051

 SVRS → NC → BO

0.148

0.104

0.199

 SVRS → NC → STS

0.173

0.126

0.225

 RSVSU → NC → CS

-0.007

-0.023

0.001

 RSVSU → NC → BO

-0.052

-0.094

-0.007

 RSVSU → NC → STS

-0.061

-0.109

-0.006

  1. Standardized estimating of 1,000 bootstrap resample
  2. Bold text refers to not statistically significant when the 95% BCBCI contains 0
  3. SVRS second victim-related stress, RSVSU reversed second victim support, PC positive coping styles; NC negative coping style, CS compassion satisfaction, BO burnout, STS secondary traumatic stress, BCBCI bias-corrected bootstrap confidence interval