Comparison between virtual and hybrid education for psychological factors and academic stress in freshman nursing students: a case-control study

Table 2 Confidence interval (95%), mean, median and interquartile range scores in cases and controls for ASCS and 10 CD-RISC questionnaires

Groups	Hybrid UCM (n = 70)		Virtual URJC (n = 70)
Item	Mean ± SD (95%CI)	Median (95%CI )	Mean ± SD (95%CI)	Median (95%CI )	p-Value *
10 CD RISC: Resilience	26.31 ± 3.82 (25.39–27.23)	26.00 (26.00–28)	26.05 ± 4.24 (25.04–27.07)	27.00 (25.00–29.00)	0.796*
ASCS COP 1: Positive Reassessment	2.90 ± 0.59 (2.76–3.05)	2.77 (2.66–3.11)	2.89 ± 0.71 (2.71–3.06)	2.77 (2.59–3.00)	0.874*
ASCS COP 2: Search for Social Support	2.93 ± 0.85 (2.73–3.14)	2.83 (2.50–3.33)	2.89 ± 0.74 (2.72–3.07)	2.83 (2.72–3.00)	0.865*
ASCS COP 3: Planning and management of personal resources	3.04 ± 0.76 (2.86–3.23)	3.14 (2.82–3.42)	2.95 ± 0.70 (2.78–3.12)	3.00 (2.76–3.14)	0.277**

Abbreviations and interpretation: SD, standard deviation; CI, confidence interval; 10 CD-RISC; Ten CD-Risk, Connor-Davidson Risk Resilience Scale, highest scores indicate the highest level of resilience, Academic Stress Coping Scale: ASCS COP 1: Positive Reassessment, highest scores indicate the highest level of resilience, ASCS COP 2: Search for Social Support, highest scores indicate the highest level of resilience; ASCS COP 3: Planning and management of personal resources, highest scores indicate the highest level of resilience; *P value from U Mann Whitney and ** Independent t Student test were applied for independent groups. In all analyses, p < 0.05 with a 95% confidence interval was considered statistically significant

ISSN: 1472-6955