Table 3 Satisfaction with the use of Twitter for the Question-and-Answer Sessions and with the overall use of Twitter for Pathophysiology course (N = 50)
Mean | SD | tb | Sig. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Satisfaction with the use of Twitter for the Question-and-Answer sessions | ||||
1. The question-and-answer sessions on Twitter were very helpful | 4.12 | 0.79 | 9.912 | 0.000 |
2. The Twitter question-and-answer sessions improved accessibility to the instructor | 4.12 | 0.89 | 8.845 | 0.000 |
3. In the future I would enjoy using Twitter in other courses | 3.74 | 0.96 | 5.423 | 0.000 |
4. The use of Twitter for question-and-answer sessions had a positive effect on my overall grade | 3.52 | 0.99 | 3.697 | 0.001 |
5. In the future I would enjoy Twitter in the classroom for asking questions during lecture | 3.52 | 1.28 | 2.869 | 0.006 |
6. I feel using Twitter for question-and-answer sessions improved my overall grade | 3.48 | 0.95 | 3.562 | 0.001 |
Satisfaction with the use of Twitter for the Pathophysiology course | ||||
1. I believe that using web technologies such as Twitter is enjoyable | 4.12 | 0.69 | 42.27 | 0.000 |
2. Using Twitter increased my overall satisfaction with the course | 3.54 | 0.91 | 27.56 | 0.000 |
3. Using Twitter was one of the best parts of this course | 3.48 | 1.16 | 21.126 | 0.000 |
4. As a learning experience, using Twitter was more enjoyable than listening to a lecture | 2.68 | 1.19 | 15.98 | 0.000 |
5. As a learning experience, using Twitter was more productive than listening to a lecture | 2.44 | 1.13 | 15.299 | 0.000 |