Skip to main content

Table 4 Significance of the mediation effect analysis of Spiritual management in the relationship between job satisfaction job engagement, organizational commitment

From: Effects of perceived spiritual management, work engagement, and organizational commitment on job satisfaction among clinical nurses: the mediating role of perceived spiritual management

Direct effect

β

SE

t

p

95% CI

LLCI

ULCI

JE→SM

0.374

0.052

7.117

< 0.001

0.2704

0.4774

 

R = .551 R2 = 0.303 F = 19.493 p < .001

JE →JS

0.214

0.035

6.104

< 0.001

0.1449

0.2831

SM→JS

0.353

0.040

8.761

< 0.001

0.2735

0.4322

 

R = .748 R2 = 0.559 F = 47.190 p < .001

OC→SM

0.282

0.030

9.522

< 0.001

0.2238

0.3406

 

R = .626 R2 = 0.392 F = 28.861 p < .001

OC→JS

0.139

0.023

6.153

< 0.001

0.0947

0.1839

SM→JS

0.316

0.043

7.342

< 0.001

0.2313

0.4010

 

R = .749 R2 = 0.560 F = 47.382 p < .001

Indirect effect

Effect

Boost SE

95% CI

LLCI

ULCI

JE →SM→JS

0.195

0.029

0.0803

0.1943

Total Effect

0.346

0.067

0.2738

0.4181

OC→SM→JS

0.089

0.018

0.0567

0.1284

Total Effect

0.229

0.021

0.1867

0.2703

  1. Note: Control variables were sex, marital status, religion and career
  2. JE = Job engagement; OC = organizational commitment; SM = spiritual management; JS = Job satisfaction
  3. CI = confidence interval; LLCI = lower limit confidence interval; SE = Standard error; ULCI = Upper limit confidence interval