Skip to main content

Table 3 Descriptive statistics for the nurses’ ICS item scores

From: Climates and associated factors for evidence-based practice implementation among nurses: a cross-sectional study

Items

Mean ± SD

1. One of this team/agency’s main goals is to use evidence-based practices effectively

3.27 ± 0.72

2. People in this team/agency think that the implementation of evidence-based

practices is important

3.34 ± 0.66

3. Using evidence-based practices is a top priority in this team/agency

3.29 ± 0.71

4. This team/agency provides conferences, workshops, or seminars focusing on

evidence-based practices

3.28 ± 0.72

5. This team/agency provides evidence-based practice trainings or in-services

3.31 ± 0.68

6. This team/agency provides evidence-based practice training materials, journals, etc.

3.30 ± 0.68

7. Clinicians in this team/agency who use evidence-based practices are seen as

clinical experts

3.26 ± 0.71

8. Clinicians who use evidence-based practices are held in high esteem in this

team/agency

3.28 ± 0.69

9. Clinicians in this team/agency who use evidence-based practices are more likely to be promoted

3.26 ± 0.69

10. This team/agency provides financial incentives for the use of evidence-based practices

3.22 ± 0.74

11. The better you are at using evidence-based practices, the more likely you are to get a bonus or a raise

3.28 ± 0.69

12. This team/agency provides the ability to accumulate compensated time for the use of evidence-based practices.

3.21 ± 0.75

13. This team/agency selects staff who have previously used evidence-based practice

3.28 ± 0.68

14. This team/agency selects staff who have had formal education supporting evidence-based practice

3.29 ± 0.68

15. This team/agency selects staff who value evidence-based practice

3.29 ± 0.67

16. This team/agency selects staff who are adaptable

3.32 ± 0.65

17. This team/agency selects staff who are flexible

3.31 ± 0.66

18. This team/agency selects staff open to new types of interventions

3.32 ± 0.66