Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics and programs of intervention for included studies

From: The impact of education/training on nurses caring for patients with stroke: a scoping review

Author, Year; Country

study Type

Staff Participants

Nursing department

Years of nursing practice

Completion of

training/activity

Patient

Participants

Mean

Patient Age (year)

Patients

Female; Male

(%)

Amato et al., 2006

USA [32]

Quasi-experimental pre-post measurement design

Nurses, N not stated

Nurses working in stroke rehabilitation units

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Booth et al., 2005

UK [28]

Quasi-experimental non-equivalent

control group

design

26 nurses

Nurses working in stroke rehabilitation units

NS

NS

37

NS

NS

Cadden, 2007 Australia [37]

Quasi-experimental pre-post measurement design

17 permanent nurses

Nurses working in stroke rehabilitation units

6 ~ 35 (SD = 14.27)

NS

NS

NS

NS

Chiu et al., 2009

China [41]

Quasi-experimental pre-post measurement design

129 nurses

Neurology specialty at neurology and neurosurgery wards

ICAI:79.3(SD ± 57.3) months; IVLP:79.3(SD ± 57.3) months

ICAI:48(64.7%); IVLP:44(65.6%)

NS

NS

NS

Chu et al., 2018

Canada [40]

Quasi-experimental pre-post measurement design

46 nurses including full-time, part-time, or casual RPNs or RNs

Nurses working in stroke rehabilitation units

11.4 (SD = 7.4)

46 (100%)

62

68

40; 60

Forster et al.,1999

UK [29]

Quasi-experimental pre-post measurement design

13 nurses

Nurses working in stroke rehabilitation units

NS

NS

Pre = 26

Post = 24

Pre = 78

Post = 77

Pre = 54;46

Post = 71; 29

Freeland et al., 2016

USA [34]

RCT

32 nurses

Medical Center

Control = 14.64 (SD = 11.96), Intervention = 16.53 (SD = 9.08)

n = 32,100% (2 weeks), n = 31,96.86% (4 weeks), and n = 29,90.63% ( 6 weeks)

2 (standardized patients)

NS

NS

Herr-Wilbert et al.,

2010

Switzerland [38]

Cohort

16 nurses

The department of neurorehabilitation

in the rehabilitation hospital

NS

NS

44

75

43; 57

Hisaka et al., 2021

Japan [43]

Cross-Sectional Web-Based Questionnaire Survey

1040 nurses

Stroke care unit

 ≤ 3(47.2%)

706 (81.70%)

NS

NS

NS

Jones et al., 1998 UK [27]

Quasi-experimental design

44 nurses and 15 HCAs

Two wards specialized in stroke rehabilitation and 4 were general medical wards

NS

59

38

73

74; 26

Jones et al., 2005

UK [30]

Cluster RCT

Nurses and HCAs, N not stated

Nurses working in stroke rehabilitation units

NS

NS

120

Control = 71, Intervention = 75

Control = 50;50, Intervention = 63; 37

Knippa et al., 2015

USA [35]

Quasi-experimental pre-post measurement design

223 nurses

neurology specialty of ICU

7.8(SD ± 7.07)

190 (85.20%)

N not stated (standardized patients)

NS

NS

Koka et al., 2020

Switzerland [39]

RCT

40 nurses

Emergency Medical Services

NS

39 (98%)

NS

NS

NS

Loft et al., 2018

USA [33]

Convergent, parallel, mixed-method design (purposively split into three groups)

36 nurses and nurse assistants

Nurses working in stroke rehabilitation units

 < 2 (8); 2–5(4); > 5(19)

31 (86.11%)

NS

NS

NS

Middleton et al.,

2011

Australia [36]

Cluster RCT

Nurses, N not stated

Acute Stroke Units (ASUs)

NS

NS

1696

 < 65 Control = 28%, Intervention = 31%

40; 60

Roots et al., 2011

UK [31]

Knowledge introduction

Nurses, N not stated

Hyperacute stroke units

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

Sylaja et al., 2021

India [42]

An open-label cluster RCT

Nurses and other community health workers, N not

stated

Community Health Workers

NS

NS

Pre = 238

Post = 234

Control = 59.43 (SD = 11.07), Intervention = 59.77 (SD = 12.17)

Control = 28.3;71.7, Intervention = 30.7; 69.3

  1. HCAs healthcare assistants, RNs registered nurses, RPNs registered practical nurses, ICAI interactive computer-assisted instruction, IVLP instructor-led videotape learning program, ICU Intensive Care Unit, NS No statement