Face-to-face versus 360° VR video: a comparative study of two teaching methods in nursing education

BMC Nursing

Table 5 Satisfaction scores of students using the face-to-face and 360º VR Video teaching methods

Satisfaction	Teaching method	N	Median	Z	N = 54 P-value
The teaching method was helpful and effective.	Face-to-Face	28	4	−2.877	0.004
The teaching method was helpful and effective.	360º VR video	26	3	−2.877	0.004
The simulation provided me with a variety of learning materials and activities to promote my learning	Face-to-Face	28	4	−2.899	0.004
	360º VR video	26	4	−2.899	0.004
I enjoyed how my instructor taught the simulation.	Face-to-Face	28	4	−3.194	0.001
I enjoyed how my instructor taught the simulation.	360º VR video	26	3.5	−3.194	0.001
The teaching materials were motivating and helped me to learn.	Face-to-Face	28	4	−1.863	0.063
	360º VR video	26	4	−1.863	0.063
The way my instructor(s) taught the simulation was suitable to the way I learn.	Face-to-Face	28	4	−3.674	< 0.001
	360º VR video	26	3	−3.674	< 0.001

Satisfaction: maximum score (25), minimum score (5)
Difference was evaluated using Wilcoxon 2- sample (Rank Sum)
Scores based on a five-point Likert scale; higher score indicating better satisfaction

ISSN: 1472-6955