Skip to main content

Table 6 Confidence scores of students using the face-to-face and 360º VR Video teaching methods

From: Face-to-face versus 360° VR video: a comparative study of two teaching methods in nursing education

Confidence

Teaching method

N

Median

Z

N = 54 P-value

I am confident that I am mastering the simulation activity my instructors presented to me.

Face-to-Face

28

4

−1.811

0.07

360º VR video

26

2

I am confident that this simulation covered critical content

Face-to-Face

28

4

0.359

0.719

360º VR video

26

4

I am confident in my skills development and obtaining the required knowledge to perform necessary tasks in a clinical setting

Face-to-Face

28

4

−0.702

0.483

360º VR video

26

4

My instructors used helpful resources to teach the simulation.

Face-to-Face

28

4

−0.918

0.359

360º VR video

26

4

It is my responsibility to learn what I need to know from this simulation activity.

Face-to-Face

28

4

0

1.000

360º VR video

26

4

I know how to get help on the concepts covered in the simulation.

Face-to-Face

28

4

−0.710

0.476

360º VR video

26

4

I know how to use simulation activities to learn critical aspects of these skills.

Face-to-Face

28

4

0.020

0.984

360º VR video

26

4

It is the instructor’s responsibility to tell me what I need to learn of the simulation activity content during class time.

Face-to-Face

28

4

0.647

0.518

360º VR video

26

4

  1. Satisfaction: maximum score (40), minimum score (8)
  2. Difference was evaluated using Wilcoxon 2- sample (Rank Sum)
  3. Scores based on a five-point Likert scale; higher score indicating better confidence